Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: SORBS Closing.

mproving >> email security. Your dedication and hard work have helped countless people >> and set high standards in our field. >> I am saddened to hear that Proofpoint is discontinuing SORBS. Your >> contributions have been invaluable, and you've made the internet a safer >&

[mailop] SORBS Closing.

For those that haven't heard.  Proofpoint is retiring SORBS effective immediately(ish). Zones will be emptied shortly and within a few weeks the SORBS domain will be parked on dedicated "decommissioning" servers. I am being made redundant as part of the shutdown and my last day will be 30th

Re: [mailop] Do we need Spam folders?

Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote: On 14 Oct 2019, at 9:29, Chris Wedgwood via mailop wrote: as things stand today, i think we do technology has gotten very good but it's not perfect; sometimes spam isn't detected, and sometimes real messages are detected as spam I would rather have

Re: [mailop] Google and the Message-Id Header

Aaron C. de Bruyn via mailop wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:51 PM Bill Cole via mailop > wrote: Not exactly garbage: if it exists, it needs a '@' and the legal content is slightly less permissive than the 'addr-spec' definition (i.e. email

Re: [mailop] Paging Proofpoint - possible issue with SSL cert for SORBS website

Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote: As per a discussion on a emailgeeks today, it seems that Firefox is throwing up a CA not trusted security alert for visitors to https:// www.secure.sorbs.net I can reproduce on Firefox but not Chrome. A cursory glance shows the server doesn't appear to offer

Re: [mailop] Paging Proofpoint - possible issue with SSL cert for SORBS website

Michael Wise via mailop wrote: Edge takes me to the site, but ... redirects me from https to http, with no overt indication of anything wrong until I click the (i), and then: “ Be careful here “ your conenction to this website isn’t “ encrypted. This makes it easier for someone “ to