Re: [mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

> On 18 Jan 2022, at 02:32, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:06 PM Grant Taylor via mailop > wrote: > Why can't automated and manual reports go to the same address? Isn't > that what recipient side filtering is for? E.g. separating RFC st

Re: [mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

Dnia 17.01.2022 o godz. 16:41:26 Michael Peddemors via mailop pisze: > > So, while there are many companies with terrible or no abuse > handlers, the problem maybe is now that the other way, where noone > reports it. Speaking for myself, I don't get a lot of spam, but when I do, I don't bother re

Re: [mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:06 PM Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: > Why can't automated and manual reports go to the same address? Isn't > that what recipient side filtering is for? E.g. separating RFC standard > DSNs / MDNs from human generated messages, each handled by different teams. > > My pr

[mailop] [SUBJECT CHANGE] Feedback loops

Yeah, maybe we should close down this thread, simply because it is a high volume thread among only a few list members, and been going on a while... For the record, for our shared mail platform that we operate for smaller ISP's and Telco's, we don't get a lot of traffic to our posted abuse add