Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-16 Thread Andris Reinman via mailop
mailauth (https://github.com/andris9/mailauth) library and cli utility can also be used to both verify and sign using Ed25519 DKIM keys. Can't see those keys to become mainstream any time soon though. RSA signature already verifies the message so double signing is basically just for testing

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-16 Thread Anders Berggren via mailop
> On 15 Feb 2021, at 22:29, Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop > wrote: > On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: >> In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >>> interop

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter via mailop
Hey Vsevolod! * Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop : > On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: > > In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any > >> interop problems? > > > >

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop
On 15/02/2021 21:02, John Levine via mailop wrote: > In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >> Greetings, >> >> is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >> interop problems? > > Aside from the fact that approximately nobody can validate

Re: [mailop] DKIM: ed22519 experiences anyone?

2021-02-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
In article <20210215085929.76srgtpbaqbms...@sys4.de> you write: >Greetings, > >is anyone using ed22519 for DKIM signatures yet and what do you see? Any >interop problems? Aside from the fact that approximately nobody can validate them yet, they're fine. So long as you don't try to use the same