Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 10 Mar 2023 20:09:10 -0500 Michael Grant via mailop
napísal:
> Oddly, today I plainly see the spamhaus listing the /64 and not the
> /32 I saw yesterday. Did something change??? I am pretty sure I
> wasn't imagining things and pretty sure I copypasted that
> 2600:3c02::/32 from
I've resolved this now.
Thanks to Matthew Stith for pointing out that Spamhaus's largest ipv6
blocks are indeed /64 and not /32.
Oddly, today I plainly see the spamhaus listing the /64 and not the
/32 I saw yesterday. Did something change??? I am pretty sure I
wasn't imagining things and pretty
>
Heho,
> > I mentioned to Michael -- in a direct email -- that I wonder if
> > there is an opportunity to put something in parent DNS zones in the
> > .arpa sub-domains, much like DS records for DNSSEC go in parent
> > zones, so that an IP provider (or at least naming authority) can
> > specify
On 3/9/23 12:45 PM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Okay, better expand on what I am saying.. say you have a bunch of IPs
from Linode, .. you 'might' want to indicate better what they are for..
eg..
sharedhosting.hisdomain.com
mailout.hisdomain.com
etc..
If the PTR's still reflect the ge
On 3/9/23 2:03 PM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Also some MTA may use different or stricter checks for IPv6 than for
IPv4, so it‘s possible that a message gets rejected while it would have
been accepted if delivered via IPv4.
I believe Google has more stringent requirements for IPv6 than
On 09.03.2023 at 18:51 Michael Grant via mailop wrote:
If I can get this spamhaus issue solved, why should I not just leave
it in place so my mailer will talk ipv4 or ipv6? Why just stick with
ipv4? I realize it's not necessary today to be able to send on ipv6
but why should I not get this work
Michael,
Feel free to hit me up off list.
Also one statement for the group, Spamhaus only lists IPv6 space in /64s
with the XBL and CSS lists. There may be larger ones in the SBL DROP or
EDROP lists but those are indicative of hijacked space and wouldn't
belong to a legit hosting company.
O
On 2023-03-09 10:33, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 3/9/23 9:45 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
AS well, you 'could' change default PTR's for segments used differently.
I find the idea of requiring PTRs to contain a magic string to be
unappetizing at best and appalling at worst
On 3/9/23 10:45 AM, Michael Grant via mailop wrote:
If I can get this spamhaus issue solved, why should I not just leave
it in place so my mailer will talk ipv4 or ipv6? Why just stick
with ipv4? I realize it's not necessary today to be able to send on
ipv6 but why should I not get this worki
On 3/9/23 9:45 AM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Yes, it's called 'rwhois'. Of course, linode can SWIP the larger
portions, with a clear indication of what parts of the IP space are used
for what.
I've opened multiple support tickets with Linode over the years asking
for SWIP and / or
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 08:45:58AM -0800, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> Yes, it's called 'rwhois'. Of course, linode can SWIP the larger portions,
> with a clear indication of what parts of the IP space are used for what.
>
> AS well, you 'could' change default PTR's for segments used dif
Yes, it's called 'rwhois'. Of course, linode can SWIP the larger
portions, with a clear indication of what parts of the IP space are used
for what.
AS well, you 'could' change default PTR's for segments used differently.
At least you are asking how you can do things differently.
I know there
Is there some way an ISP can tell an RBL how it's split up it's
internal IP address space? For example, our Linode's ipv6 address is
on the Spamhaus XBL, but it's the entire /28. (Thanks Tobias for
prompting me to check this!)
Anyway, it got me wondering, is there some way an ISP such as Linode
13 matches
Mail list logo
