> On 30 Jan 2024, at 01:20, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
> wrote:
>
>>> On 28 Jan 2024, at 20:23, Thomas Walter via mailop
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified a
> > On 28 Jan 2024, at 20:23, Thomas Walter via mailop
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> >> There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified as
> >> spam
> >> or non-spam. Even with best tuned spam filtering systems false posit
Dnia 28.01.2024 o godz. 22:04:26 Jay Hennigan via mailop pisze:
> Conversely, when the receiver purges everything else in the spam
> folder without opening it, this gives feedback that the decision to
> route it to spam was correct.
And this is often the problem, because - as I mentioned - users t
Dnia 28.01.2024 o godz. 23:44:29 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze:
> What if the receiving mail server tagged the message in some way in their
> final acknowledgement of the message. For Google. instead of:
>
> 250 2.0.0 OK 1706409809
> h4-20020ac8584400b10427e71c979dsi9837397zyh.449 - gsmtp
>
> On 28 Jan 2024, at 20:23, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
>> There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified as spam
>> or non-spam. Even with best tuned spam filtering systems false positives
>> will happen.
>
On 1/28/24 21:44, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
What if the receiving mail server tagged the message in some way in
their final acknowledgement of the message. For Google. instead of:
250 2.0.0 OK 1706409809
h4-20020ac8584400b10427e71c979dsi9837397zyh.449 - gsmtp
If the message is red
What if the receiving mail server tagged the message in some way in their
final acknowledgement of the message. For Google. instead of:
250 2.0.0 OK 1706409809
h4-20020ac8584400b10427e71c979dsi9837397zyh.449 - gsmtp
If the message is redirected to the user's spambox, the message could be:
On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified as spam
or non-spam. Even with best tuned spam filtering systems false positives
will happen.
So why not just deliver these to the Inbox then - and add a tag/label
instead
Dnia 27.01.2024 o godz. 13:21:46 Thomas Walter via mailop pisze:
>
> To me it just doesn't make a lot of sense to basically have two
> inboxes to check - the regular one and the spamfolder.
>
> Also having to tell people to check their spamfolders every time
> they are missing an email is annoyin
Hello,
On 27.01.24 12:47, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
There is remediation available. What there isn’t is some imprimatur that
ensures that every email is delivered to the inbox every time unless the
sender considers it spam and agrees with the decision. That’s just not
how it works.
Wel
10 matches
Mail list logo
