Still nothing, no feedback at all, from SpamEatingMonkey :-(
On 10/07/2023 17:12, Mathieu via mailop wrote:
I feel a bit desperate, because my domain has SPF "-all", and all emails
are DKIM signed. I don't know what I can do better to stop being listed
again and again.
On a suggestion from
On 7/11/23 4:18 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Sadly, you're probably right. It would take someone as universally
trusted (and as trustworthy) as Jon Postel was once, to run such a
service. But there are no people like Jon Postel in decisive
positions anymore...
Yes, I try to find the
Dňa 11. júla 2023 7:24:29 UTC používateľ Mathieu via mailop
napísal:
>Actually, it adds 3.5 *by scope*. And it has 3 scopes: url, email and dkim.
>Which eventually sum up to 10.5... You would reject our messages.
Ah, i miss that. But no, i will not reject your messages, as 10
is threshold for
Dnia 11.07.2023 o godz. 02:26:02 Rob McEwen via mailop pisze:
> First, Grant, you're far too trusting of institutions and
> government. They're especially corrupt these days. Many governments
> that have had decades or centuries-long track records for bing
> mostly trustworthy and fair - are
Thankfully, it seems there is a kind of "Whitelisted by policy":
https://spameatingmonkey.com/lookup/gmail.com
"This is a normal email service, don't you know gmail?" :-D
https://spameatingmonkey.com/lookup/gandi.net
With an evidence looking exactly like mines.
On 10/07/2023 20:01, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Sources are on github, any one can see that. It adds 3,5 score by
default, while relative high, not significant itself and requires other
marks. 3,5 is not enough to mark message as SPAM even with
default thresholds, on my site 10 is required for
valuement
-- Original Message --
From "Michael Peddemors via mailop"
To mailop@mailop.org
Date 7/10/2023 8:29:14 PM
Subject Re: [mailop] Isn't SpamEatingMonkey's SEM-URI broken?
Actually, what I like is those companies that show real time stats on RBL's,
you get to see who is
Actually, what I like is those companies that show real time stats on
RBL's, you get to see who is the most accurate, not only who would block
the most..
If you get 'inaccuracies', then someone has done something wrong.
M3AAWG might be exactly the WRONG organization for this, given it's
On 7/10/23 2:40 PM, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
The problem is, running any blacklist and wanting to constantly speak to
people who are often just confused about how relevant your list even is,
are very often two different things. So there's not anyone to talk to,
at least not from a
