ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/cygwin/release/make/make-3.81-1-src.tar.bz2
angelo.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
> > From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:23:39 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ftp://ftp.ale.org/pub/mirrors/cygwin/release/make
Thanks, I'm downloading it now.
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
At 12:03 PM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~". Diffing
>> those
>> with their non-.foo~ counterparts shows the differences.
>
>Thanks, but wh
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:55:57 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The Cygwin source tar ball contains files which end in ".foo~". Diffing those
> with their non-.foo~ counterparts shows the differences.
Thanks, but where do I find the Cygwin source tarball? I don't want
> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:43:18 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I guess another point of reference would be an un-patched make 3.81 from
> ftp.gnu.org.
Or produce a patched Cygwin binary by patching the sources from the
Cygwin source tarball.
___
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:28:31PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
>> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> - Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>>
>> From: Angelo Graziosi
>> To: cygwin
>> Subject: Problems with
At 07:55 AM 10/2/2006, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>At 07:28 AM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>\
>>William, when you built the binary you provide on
>>http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe, did you patch the sources
>>prepared by Chris for Cygwin, or did you patch the official sources of
>>Ma
At 07:28 AM 10/2/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>\
>William, when you built the binary you provide on
>http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe, did you patch the sources
>prepared by Chris for Cygwin, or did you patch the official sources of
>Make 3.81 as found on ftp.gnu.org?
I used the source fro
> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Forwarded message from Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: Angelo Graziosi
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Problems with patched gnu make ? (was:Need Volunteers to test patch
> for gnu make
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:26:18 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> (Who is 'TIA' ?)
TIA = Thanks In Advance.
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:30:13 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> Should I run "make -p --debug=i" just after 'configure' or shouls I run
>
>configure
>make
>cd ../.build/gcc
>"make -p --debug=i"
>...
The latter one.
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I need the results of "make -p --debug=i" from this directory:
>
> `/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc'
>
> (This is the directory where the build fails.) This could help me
> understand the cause of the failure.
>
> Could you please
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:52:21 +0200 (MET DST)
> > From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: make-w32@gnu.org
> > >
> > > If nothing gives the clue, I guess posting here the full output of
> > > "make -d" in both cases would be the way to go.
I need the results of "make -p --debug=i" from this directory:
`/home/Angelo/Downloads/GFortran/gcc/.build/gcc'
(This is the directory where the build fails.) This could help me
understand the cause of the failure.
Could you please post what that produces, with both unpatched and
patched ve
> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:52:21 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: make-w32@gnu.org
> >
> > If nothing gives the clue, I guess posting here the full output of
> > "make -d" in both cases would be the way to go.
> >
>
> I will try but you should to have in mind tha
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:59:00 -0400
> >
> > I use this since Sep 08, but now I have found a problem with
> > http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe.
>
> What is this URL? Are you sure this is the binary compiled from
> official Make 3.81 dist
16 matches
Mail list logo
