]
To: Bill Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MapInfo-L (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: MI-L MapInfo improvements - Noise ratio?
Bill and Steve
Noise ratio?
You suggest that there has been a rush to sell by MapInfo insiders? This
is
simply not so. I see
with the program.
Marc Plato
AOL Time Warner
- Original Message -
From: Neil Havermale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MapInfo-L (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:19 PM
Subject: RE: MI-L MapInfo improvements - Noise ratio?
Bill and Steve
I agree with Marc,
this discussion is leading nowhere. I've been
following it from the soft shoulder. It bothers me
that the list is used for these type of discussions!
We are users, programmers and other product related
people, we're not related to the MI company!
I hope this is the final
: MI-L MapInfo improvements - Noise ratio?
I agree with Marc,
this discussion is leading nowhere. I've been
following it from the soft shoulder. It bothers me
that the list is used for these type of discussions!
We are users, programmers and other product related
people, we're not related
that in the long run we all die - but we won't be using
MI (or esri)for quite some time before we get there.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hoskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1:34 PM
To: MapInfo-L list
Subject: RE: MI-L MapInfo improvements - Noise ratio?
With due
Bill and Steve
Noise ratio?
You suggest that there has been a rush to sell by MapInfo insiders? This is
simply not so. I see a fairly well run small company with some of its
officers exercising their options knowing that they may have more yet to
come.
At best all I can see in the last 30
Myself, I am keeping my eye on the ball and the near-term potential for
MapInfo to be a, possibly the, significant GIS player in the pending 2.5 and
3.0G wireless revolution. Given there are at best 1.5 to 1.8 million GISers
out there growing at 25 percent per year (Hey MapPoint is going to get
