Looks like we are all clear now, I'll create an RC presently.
Thanks everyone.
Arun
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear.
As others seem to agree, I think we'll be better getting a protocol/api
stable GA done and then
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear.
As others seem to agree, I think we'll be better getting a protocol/api
stable GA done and then iterating on bugs etc.
I'm not super worried about HADOOP-9984 since symlinks just made it
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1. We should get an RC as soon as possible so that we can get all the
downstream components to sign off.
The earlier the better.
On this very note -- would there be any interest in joining efforts
with the
I don't think HADOOP-9972 is a must-do for the next Apache release,
whatever version number it ends up having. It's just adding a new
API, not changing any existing ones, and it can be done entirely in
generic code. (The globber doesn't involve FileSystem or AFS
subclasses).
My understanding is
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the critical
fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in YARN/MR, there is fairly
little content (unit tests fixes etc.)
Furthermore, it's standing up well in testing too. Plus, the protocols look
good for now (I
Arun,
Does this mean that you want to skip a beta release and go straight to GA
with the next release?
thx
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984
I am +1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in YARN/MR,
there is fairly little
(This time copying all the lists)
I am +1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the
critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in
+1. We should get an RC as soon as possible so that we can get all the
downstream components to sign off. The earlier the better.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Guys,
I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the critical
fixes such as
Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear.
As others seem to agree, I think we'll be better getting a protocol/api stable
GA done and then iterating on bugs etc.
I'm not super worried about HADOOP-9984 since symlinks just made it to
branch-2.1 recently.
Currently we only have 2 blockers: HADOOP-9984
10 matches
Mail list logo
