With 24 +1s (10 binding) and no -1s the vote passes.
Thanks for everyone who tried the release and provided feedback.
I'll push the bits and send out a note.
thanks,
Arun
On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.
+1 (non-binding)
+ built from source tarball
+ ran some example jobs in HiBench such as
nutchindexing, wordcount, dfsioe, hivebench, kmeans, pagerank, bayes, sort,
terasort
on 3 node cluster.
I'm on the same side with Tsuyoshi and would like HDFS-6833 to be fixed in
2.6.1 at least.
Masata
+1 if once discussion about HDFS-6833 is done(non-binding).
* Verified checksum.
* Deployed cluster and ran some mr examples.
* Checked RM restart while running jobs.
> I think you have to pass along -Pdist too… afaik that is how the Jenkins we
> use for building release artifacts operates.
Th
+1 (binding) on the source tarball, would be nice to redo the binary
tarball.
- Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster, and ran some HDFS and MR jobs.
- The binary is about 40 MB larger than the previous release; it appears
the docs are copied over twice - share/doc/hadoop and share/hadoop. The
binary tar
+1,
Built from source.
Deployed a single node cluster.
Ran sample MapReduce jobs while restarting RM successfully.
Jian
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Eric Payne
wrote:
> +1 . Thanks Arun, for producing this release. I downloaded and built
> the source. I started local cluster and ran wordco
+1 . Thanks Arun, for producing this release. I downloaded and built the
source. I started local cluster and ran wordcount, sleep, and streaming jobs.
- I ran a distributed shell job which tested preserving containers across AM
restart by setting the -keep_containers_across_application_attempts
Tsuyoshi,
I think you have to pass along -Pdist too… afaik that is how the Jenkins we
use for building release artifacts operates.
For now, I've marked HADOOP-11316 for inclusion into 2.6.1 if required.
thanks,
Arun
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also foun
Hi,
I also found that a following command fails with hadoop-2.6.0-rc1-src.tar.gz:
$ mvn package -Pdocs -DskipTests -Dtar
I filed it as HADOOP-11316. We should fix it if possible. Or, should
we fix it for 2.6.1?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> Suresh
Suresh, Tsz-Wo,
Thanks for your comments.
Could you check a comment by Masatake on HDFS-6833?
thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
> with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression
+1 (suppose using md5 is intentional.)
Verified md5 and ran a single node HA HDFS cluster for some time. Everything
worked great.
Regards,Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:48 PM, Tsz Wo Sze
wrote:
Hi Arun,
Only md5 is provided but not mds? Is it intentional?
Tsz-Wo
On
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
+1 (non-binding)
- Built from source
- Setup a security cluster with 4 nodes, and verified various fs operations.
- Verified MapReduce examples in security mode.
- Verify HDFS encryption at rest in security mode.
Regards,
Yi Liu
-Original Message
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Setup a security cluster with 4 nodes, and verified various fs operations.
- Verified MapReduce examples in security mode.
- Verify HDFS encryption at rest in security mode.
Regards,
Yi Liu
-Original Message-
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks
Hi Arun,
Only md5 is provided but not mds? Is it intentional?
Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 2:14 PM, Tsz Wo Sze
wrote:
I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression (please correct me if I am
w
I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression (please correct me if I am
wrong.)Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 10:06 AM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
Tsuyoshi, thanks for bringing up HDFS-6833. However
+1 (binding)
Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from
the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single
node cluster and tested the following:
- Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying
data back and forth, v
+1 (non-binding)
- Deployed single node cluster
- Verified reservation system works (YARN-1051) by making reservations and
submitting sample MR jobs against the reservations
- Verified move apps between capacity scheduler queues (YARN-2378)
Thanks,
Subru
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Charles
Hi Suresh,
I did review HDFS-6833 and the patch Shinichi provided a while back. It's
not really directly related to replication factor. The problem reported
there is, DirectoryScanner tries to register with NN blocks already
scheduled to be deleted as regular blocks, due to the delay in block
remo
Tsuyoshi, thanks for bringing up HDFS-6833. However, given it is a boundary
condition (and should not cause issues when for files with replication
factor 3), we should perhaps target this into 2.6.1 and not block this
release. Thoughts?
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> +0
I built from the src package, started a cluster, created an encryption
zone and read/wrote data from/to it.
+1 (non-binding)
Charles
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures and digests- verified late-arriving fixes for YARN-2846
and MAPREDUCE-6156 were present
- built from source- deployed to a single-node cluster
- ran some sample MapReduce jobs
Jason
From: Arun C Murthy
To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"hdfs-...@hado
+0(non-binding)
HDFS-6833 is critical issue for us - could you help us to merge it into 2.6?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Built Hadoop from source, compiled Tez against the hadoop jars pushed to
> staging repo and ran a few example T
+1 (binding)
Built Hadoop from source, compiled Tez against the hadoop jars pushed to
staging repo and ran a few example Tez jobs on a single node cluster.
— HItesh
On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.6.0
Hi Eric,
There was a second release candidate created (named rc1), and voting
started fresh in a new thread. You might want to join in on that second
thread to make sure that your vote gets counted. Thanks!
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Eri
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures for source and binary tarballs.
- Started a pseudo-distributed HDFS cluster in secure mode with SSL.
- Tested various file system operations.
- Verified HDFS-2856, the new feature to run a secure DataNode without
requiring root.
- Verified HDFS-7385
+1
I downloaded and built source. Started local cluster and ran wordcount, sleep,
and simple streaming job.
Also, I ran a distributed shell job which tested preserving containers across
AM restart by setting the -keep_containers_across_application_attempts flag and
killing the first AM once the
Thanks Arun for leading the 2.6 release effort.
+1 (non-binding)
- Downloaded rc1 source and did build
- Created two single-node clusters running 2.6
- Ran sample mapreduce job
- Ran distcp between two clusters
--Yongjun
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've
+1 (non-binding)
Replayed the verifications for rc0, and everything keeps working fine.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Chen He wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> download and compile source code;
> setup single node cluster;
> successfully run sleep job;
>
> Regards!
>
> Chen
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 201
+1 binding
purged local m2 repos of org/apache/hadoop/*
rebuilt and reran slider unit and functional tests on OSX and windows,
triggered jenkins builds on Centos & debian. All passed.
On 13 November 2014 23:08, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for
Thanks Arun for creating another rc!
+1 (non-binding)
- patched Tez 0.5.2 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1
- patched Hive 0.14 pom to compile against 2.6.0-rc1
- run several Hive queries on Tez
Thanks,
Akira
(11/14/14, 10:16), Wangda Tan wrote:
Thanks Arun!
Have tried compile, deploy and con
Thanks Arun!
Have tried compile, deploy and configured a local cluster and can
successfully execute a job with node labels.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Wangda
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Ravi Prakash wrote:
> Thanks for the respin Arun!
> I've verified all checksums, and tested that the Dock
-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
I have committed HDFS-7385 down through branch-2.6.0. Thank you!
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> I'm helping to expedite a complete, approved patch
Thanks for the respin Arun!
I've verified all checksums, and tested that the DockerContainerExecutor was
able to launch jobs.
I'm a +1 on the release
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:09 PM, Arun C Murthy
wrote:
Folks,
I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.6.0
;> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:58 AM
>> To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
>> Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Ravi Prakash;
>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
>>
>> Sounds good.
[mailto:a...@hortonworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:58 AM
> To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Ravi Prakash;
> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
>
> Sound
he.org"
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
Sounds good. I'll create an rc1. Thanks.
Arun
On Nov 11, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Robert Kanter wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> We were testing the RC and ran into a problem with the recent
lto:a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 12:58 AM
To: yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Ravi Prakash; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0
Sounds good. I'll create an rc1. Thanks.
Arun
Sounds good. I'll create an rc1. Thanks.
Arun
On Nov 11, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Robert Kanter wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> We were testing the RC and ran into a problem with the recent fixes that
> were done for POODLE for Tomcat (HADOOP-11217 for KMS and HDFS-7274 for
> HttpFS). Basically, in disabling
+1 (non-binding)
* Downloaded the source tar ball, and built binaries from it successfully.
* Ran DS apps and MR jobs with emitting timeline data enabled successfully.
* Verified the generic history information, DS-specific and MR-specific
metrics were available.
* Ran the timeline server in secur
Thanks Arun for creating the RC.
Tried to build and deploy it on a local distributed cluster, can
successfully run distributed shell job with node labels.
+1 (non-binding),
Thanks,
Wangda
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Robert Kanter wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> We were testing the RC and ran into
Hi Arun,
We were testing the RC and ran into a problem with the recent fixes that
were done for POODLE for Tomcat (HADOOP-11217 for KMS and HDFS-7274 for
HttpFS). Basically, in disabling SSLv3, we also disabled SSLv2Hello, which
is required for older clients (e.g. Java 6 with openssl 0.9.8x) so t
Hi Arun!
We are very close to completion on YARN-1964 (DockerContainerExecutor). I'd
also like HDFS-4882 to be checked in. Do you think these issues merit another
RC?
ThanksRavi
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:57 AM, Steve Loughran
wrote:
+1 binding
-patched slider pom to build
+1 binding
-patched slider pom to build against 2.6.0
-verified build did download, which it did at up to ~8Mbps. Faster than a
local build.
-full clean test runs on OS/X & Linux
Windows 2012:
Same thing. I did have to first build my own set of the windows native
binaries, by checking out bra
Duh!
$ chmod a+r *
Please try now. Thanks!
Arun
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
> got a following error:
>
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access
> /~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-
Hi Arun,
Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
got a following error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access
/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-rc0/hadoop-2.6.0-src.tar.gz on this server.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've create
44 matches
Mail list logo