Hello Steve,
Lime, Steve D (DNR) steve.l...@state.mn.us, [20100309 - 22:35:51]
Hi Stephan: This is an increasingly asked question but at the moment
I don't have a good solution or workaround, it's just not possible at
the moment. There's a ticket already filed on the subject and it will
be
Hello Brent,
pcr...@pcreso.com, [20100309 - 23:49:56]
Hi Stephan,
Can you not add an appropriate column automatically as the shapefile
is generated?
Tools such as dbfscript (http://www.whitetown.com/dbf-script/) or
perhaps script something with the shapelib libraries or tools or the
Yep, always frustrating to suffer such constraints.
Can you not define the layer in mapserver as an ogr layer rather than a native
shapefile, and use ogr's pseudo-sql to cast/retrieve the value as a numeric
more suitable for labeling with?
http://www.gdal.org/ogr/ogr_sql.html
Then in your
Hello Brent,
pcr...@pcreso.com, [20100310 - 00:25:21]
Yep, always frustrating to suffer such constraints.
Can you not define the layer in mapserver as an ogr layer rather than
a native shapefile, and use ogr's pseudo-sql to cast/retrieve the
value as a numeric more suitable for labeling
I also would be very happy to test any patch that added label formatting
capabilities.
Cheers,
Stephen
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 15:05:51 Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote:
Hi Stephan: This is an increasingly asked question but at the moment I
don't have a good solution or workaround, it's just not
Nobody suggests anything??
-Mensaje original-
De: mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] En nombre de David Alda
Fernandez de Lezea
Enviado el: martes, 09 de marzo de 2010 11:35
Para: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Asunto:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:20:35 -0800, David Alda Fernandez de Lezea
da...@ikt.es wrote:
So, our doubts have to do with the following subjects:
- Processor
- RAM Memory
- HDD (we know that has to be large, i.e. 1TB - 2TB)
- Number of network adapters (is advisable to have more than one?)
-
Hi David
Check out Building a GIS System Architecture Design Strategies for
Managers from Dave Peters - Esri Press. Just as a start point.
Cheers
JC
-Mensaje original-
De: David Alda Fernandez de Lezea [mailto:da...@ikt.es]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 10 de Marzo de 2010 08:21 a.m.
Para:
Hi,
Maybe this can help you.
http://2009.foss4g.org/presentations/#presentation_109
[]'s
Luigi Castro Cardeles
2010/3/10 Fuchs Juan Carlos jf...@indec.mecon.gov.ar:
Hi David
Check out Building a GIS System Architecture Design Strategies for
Managers from Dave Peters - Esri Press. Just as a
Thanks Luigi, I'll have a look.
-Mensaje original-
De: Luigi Castro Cardeles [mailto:luigi.carde...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de marzo de 2010 14:43
Para: Fuchs Juan Carlos
CC: David Alda Fernandez de Lezea; mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Asunto: Re: [mapserver-users] Looking
Stephan,
Since there isn't a MapServer solution until 6.0, a work around could be a
python/php/other language script to populate a new column with a lower
precision value. It wouldn't be that hard to write.
David.
-Original Message-
From: mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Steve,
Thanks for your response.
The thing is that the technology we have to use is MapServer + TileCache + OL,
so there's no possible discussion about this, it's not my decision. We have now
everything setted up in a test environment (it's an Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 at
2.4 GHz PC with 2 GB
Hello,
using mapserv (5.6.1) with PostGIS (8.3) and accessing ten-thousands of geo
locations in the PostGIS db results in very slow speed when using the WMS TIME
parameter:
(in this example the number is about 4000 datapoints for this day, timing
measurements with DEBUG OFF).
1) Very fast
Hi Frank,
I know it's difficult to answer those questions, I just needed some guidelines,
or some indications of where search. I appreciate the answers and help of these
kind people. Now I have some ideas.
Thanks.
David.
-Mensaje original-
De: Frank Warmerdam
On 3/9/2010 4:34 AM, David Alda Fernandez de Lezea wrote:
Hello list,
So, our doubts have to do with the following subjects:
- Processor
- RAM Memory
- HDD (we know that has to be large, i.e. 1TB - 2TB)
- Number of network adapters (is advisable to have more than one?)
- Which
Firstly, 2 seconds is not fast, so you have another performance troll
beyond this one.
Secondly, it's impossible to know what's going on inside the database
without seeing the actual SQL being generated. Turn on statement
loggging in PgSQL and extract the SQL that is being run against the
David,
I don't remember all of your original post, so forgive me if you have already
covered this.
When looking at performance, make sure that you have done everything possible
to optimize your data.
-tiles and pyramids for rasters
-all data in the output spatial reference system
Am Mittwoch 10 März 2010 16:42:02 schrieben Sie:
Thanks for the hint.
Hm, i thought 4000 out of 4.5 Millions datasets for the whole year in 5 sec
would be not that bad
The timing figure shall just show the huge difference between the two types of
requests.
I will follow your advice and
Hi all,
I noticed something odd when I do a query with the new 5.6.1 version.
The getFeature method seems to return a NULL value, when it was working good
before the new version update.
Here's the code:
$n = $map-numlayers;
for ($i = 0; $i $n; $i++) {
$theme = $map-GetLayer($i);
On 3/10/2010 3:53 PM, Carlos Ruiz wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed something odd when I do a query with the new 5.6.1 version.
The getFeature method seems to return a NULL value, when it was working
good before the new version update.
Here's the code:
$n = $map-numlayers;
for ($i = 0; $i $n; $i++)
Carlos Ruiz wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed something odd when I do a query with the new 5.6.1 version.
The getFeature method seems to return a NULL value, when it was working
good before the new version update.
Due to a change in the handling of queries in version 5.6, ols scripts
must be
Luigi Castro Cardeles wrote:
Hi,
Maybe this can help you.
http://2009.foss4g.org/presentations/#presentation_109
I would like to add that there is at least some off-list talk of some
Windows vs Unix benchmarking for the 2010 exercise
(http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Benchmarking_2010). As the
22 matches
Mail list logo
