Hello Yewondwossen,
Yewondwossen Assefa , [20100429 - 07:46:39]
> Stephan Holl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ist it possible to disable the support for WMS 1.3.0 with a
> > configuration switch right now?
> > It could be handy for some of my usecases.
> >
> >
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Not that I know of.
I usually find that an untiled openlayers wms layer with
transitionEffect:resize has a pretty similar effect that that of a
tiled layer, as the map isn't hidden as soon as the user stops
panning, but is replaced with the new image once that one arrives.
YMMV.
regards,
thomas
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010
On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:23 PM, ext Adam Eskreis wrote:
> I tried doing ratio:1 unfortunately it doesn't seem like enough of a
> performance increase. Separate layers for each category is an option,
> however, there are over a hundred categories, and any combination of
> categories can be on at
Adam,
It sounds like you have boiled the issue down to too much of a time lag between
the time the query is executed and the image appears in the client.
Is it taking a long time for MapServer to draw the image, or is it the delivery
of the image to the requesting machine and subsequent placeme
I added ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/344. Support will
be added for the next release and I will possibly prepare a patch for
5.6.x branch if needed.
regards,
On 30/04/2010 4:42 AM, Stephan Holl wrote:
Hello Yewondwossen,
Yewondwossen Assefa, [20100429 - 07:46:39]
Steph
It's that time of year again! The Community Program Review for FOSS4G has begun!
http://2010.foss4g.org/review/
If you're going to FOSS4G, or seriously thinking about going, the
review is a way to ensure that the program includes topics you are
interested in. You scroll through a list of all the
I am trying to understand the results I am getting from WCS requests
to MapServer.
If I make the same request changing only the WCS version the images I
get back are shifted by 1 pixel in the x and y directions. A request
for VERSION=1.1.0 gives me the image I expect while VERSION=1.0.0
gives me ba
Is there a way to turn a pixel transparent? That is,
something like:
CLASS
EXPRESSION ([red] > 200 AND [green] > 200 AND [blue] > 200 )
TRANSPARENT
END
Or is there a way to set the pixel to the index of the
transparent entry in the color table?
Also, is there an 'ELSE' clause to the class