me
*Kopio:* mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
*Aihe:* Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
IMHO, if you do a SHAPEPATH at the layer level then you might as well
just add the full-path to the DATA element. You’re not really gaining
anything with the additional complexity. Did the idea of usi
sers
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:14 AM
To: Steve Lime
Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
How about a shapepath at the layer level? I am combining 20 years of working with old maps in three (or four :-)) different countries (Netherlands
. joulukuuta 2023 21.59
Vastaanottaja: j.l.h.hartm...@gmail.com; Steve Lime
Kopio: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Aihe: Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
IMHO, if you do a SHAPEPATH at the layer level then you might as well just add
the full-path to the DATA element. You’re not really
MapServer-users
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:14 AM
To: Steve Lime
Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [MapServer-users] multiple shapepaths
How about a shapepath at the layer level? I am combining 20 years of working
with old maps in three (or four :-)) different countries
No, this would make the file system on my server an even worse spaghetti
mess than when I move the files physically under one root. I want to
leave everything as distributed as possible.
Cheers, Rich, Steve and all,
Jan
On 06/12/2023 14:21, Richard Greenwood wrote:
How about just symlink in
How about a shapepath at the layer level? I am combining 20 years of working with old maps in three (or four :-)) different countries (Netherlands, Germany and Flemish and Walloon Belgium), all in their own formats, projections, directories an servers. It would help to keep my applications (and my
It won’t work. A configuration is loaded in entirety first, and then
applied as necessary.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:21 AM Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users <
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Not sure. I cannot get it working anyway. Any ideas, Steve?
>
> On 04/12/2023 10:10, Jörg Thomsen
Not sure. I cannot get it working anyway. Any ideas, Steve?
On 04/12/2023 10:10, Jörg Thomsen (WhereGroup) via MapServer-users wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure, but perhaps overwriting it, would work?
MAP
shapepath 'blah'
Layer 1
Layer 2
shapepath 'blubb'
Layer 3
Layer 4
Jörg
Am 02
Hi,
I am not sure, but perhaps overwriting it, would work?
MAP
shapepath 'blah'
Layer 1
Layer 2
shapepath 'blubb'
Layer 3
Layer 4
Jörg
Am 02.12.23 um 19:32 schrieb Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users:
Yes, that is what I sought, didn't know it was possible. Thanks!
Jan
On 02/
Yes, that is what I sought, didn't know it was possible. Thanks!
Jan
On 02/12/2023 19:29, Steve Lime wrote:
One other thought, you can use multiple paths via runtime subs to
approximate what I think you’re looking for, so:
WEB
VALIDATION
path1_default “/opt/path1”
path1 “^\/opt\/pat
One other thought, you can use multiple paths via runtime subs to
approximate what I think you’re looking for, so:
WEB
VALIDATION
path1_default “/opt/path1”
path1 “^\/opt\/path1$”
path2_default “/opt/path2”
path2 “^\/opt\/path2$”
END
END
Then in DATA values you’d use %path1% o
Nope, just the one value.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:02 PM Jan Hartmann via MapServer-users <
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use multiple paths in a shapepath? ./data1:./data2
> does not work
>
> Jan
> ___
> MapServer-
Hi,
Is it possible to use multiple paths in a shapepath? ./data1:./data2
does not work
Jan
___
MapServer-users mailing list
MapServer-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
13 matches
Mail list logo
