Hello everybody!
I've build external overviews, both with raster and vector data, put
them into layers with MIN-/MAXSCALE and it works like a charme. My only
problem is that I can not get the switching of those layers transparent
to the user. A "GetCapabilities"-WMS-Request returns all layers
sep
er, Andreas - SID-NLK
> Lähetetty: 5. maaliskuuta 2008 10:24
> Vastaanottaja: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Aihe: [mapserver-users] Hiding overviews
>
>
> Hello everybody!
>
> I've build external overviews, both with raster and vector
> data, put them into layers
Hi!
I'm trying to do the exact same thing, but havn't found any solutions
either. I ended up by putting all the "zoom levels" in separate layers, and
group all these layers in one named group layer.
There has been some discussions regarding this issue in an older dev thread:
http://www.nabble.co
Ok guys. I examined the situation and came to the conclusion that it is
a bug in MapServer.
In the source of mapserver v5.0.2, file mapwms.c, line 1071:
> msOWSPrintEncodeParam(stdout, "LAYER.NAME", lp->name, OWS_WARN,
> "%s\n", NULL);
should really be
> msOWS
once.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Puolesta
Eichner, Andreas - SID-NLK
Lähetetty: 5. maaliskuuta 2008 10:24
Vastaanottaja: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Aihe: [mapserver-users] Hiding overviews
Hello everybody!
I
Hi!
Did you commit this change in the MapServer trunk?
PS! Has any of you developers seen this thread, and would it be feasible to
add the patch to the trunk?
Eichner, Andreas - SID-NLK wrote:
>
>
>
> Ok guys. I examined the situation and came to the conclusion that it is
> a bug in Ma
I had a quick look at this thread and it seems to me at first that using
GROUP in all layers corresponding to the same set of overviews should
allow you to turn all of them on/off at once.
With respect to this proposed change, I don't see why it would be needed
since the layer.name is optional
Daniel Morissette wrote:
I had a quick look at this thread and it seems to me at first that using
GROUP in all layers corresponding to the same set of overviews should
allow you to turn all of them on/off at once.
I built a small test case and it seems that the root problem is that the
func
Hi! Daniel!
Yes, this is indeed what I'm trying to achieve. I can't answer for others,
but for what I've read it looks like the described behavior is what most
people wants. I guess someone would like the ability to totally hide some
layers from the capabilities document, but in my opinion that's
Pål Kristensen wrote:
Yes, this is indeed what I'm trying to achieve. I can't answer for others,
but for what I've read it looks like the described behavior is what most
people wants. I guess someone would like the ability to totally hide some
layers from the capabilities document, but in my opi
Thanks!
I really appreciate the quick response, and the effort you developers put in
to meet the needs of the MapServer community users.
Regards,
Pål Kristensen
Daniel Morissette-2 wrote:
>
>
> FYI I have created a ticket for this:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2562
>
> I can't
Hi Daniel!
Thanks for creating the ticket! I don't mean to rush you, but have you had
the time to commit the changes to SVN yet? Anyway, thanks again for the
quick response.
dmorissette wrote:
>
>
> FYI I have created a ticket for this:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2562
>
> I ca
12 matches
Mail list logo