Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Tangentially, I notice that this post by Waylan uses a link syntax which doesn't seem to be defined by but seems to work in some implementations at - that is, from the git repo [1] instead of from the git re

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Thomas Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tangentially, I notice that this post by Waylan uses a link syntax which > doesn't seem to be defined by > but seems to > work in some implementations at

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Thomas Nichols wrote: > Tangentially, I notice that this post by Waylan uses a link syntax which > doesn't seem to be defined by > but seems to > work in some implementations at - that is, > > from the git r

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the > changelog entry: > > 1.0.2b2 - 20 Mar 2005 > >+ Experimental support for [this] as a synonym for [this][]. Interestingly, this a completely differ

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Waylan Limberg wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the > > changelog entry: > > > > 1.0.2b2 - 20 Mar 2005 > > > >+ Experimental support for [this] as a synonym for [this][].

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Jason Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Waylan Limberg wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the >> > changelog entry: >> > >> > 1.0.2b2 - 20

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Le 2008-11-21 à 11:36, Jason Blevins a écrit : On Babelmark Markdown.pl 1.0.2b8 honors this implicit reference syntax but 1.0.1 doesn't. I was aware of this syntax so my expected output is that of the beta version. I haven't used it myself though because I've often wondered how 'standard'

Re: Link syntax (was: definition lists?)

Le 2008-11-21 à 12:26, Jason Blevins a écrit : Superscripts are nice in print, but there you don't have to click on them. With a proper stylesheet you can make them as easy to click as anything else. Look at footnotes on Daring Fireball for instance: