Le 2010-11-19 04:36, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 23:39 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote:
Now this is something we can work with. Tomorrow I will try to integrate
this into the wiki, and as I have some time free I will launch into
designing an artwork workflow and publication sy
I'll try to put some information that I think is pertinent and perhaps
members will chime in and add other information of their own.
The information needed is not for data but merely to help in
establishing the structure; file format considerations etc. so that when
the migration from the Silv
Thanks Italo:
Le 2010-11-20 14:30, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 11/20/2010 07:58 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
* Ideas: area where team members can chat in public as well as a private
area; public and private mailist; white board area to comment on design
graphs or to rough sketch live for examples ... c
Le 2010-11-20 16:22, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 11/20/2010 08:46 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Have you ever had an artwork contributor send a photoshop file for the
team to look at? If so, the Drupal site Team Devs will test the site to
make sure that there are no hiccups if this is ever done. The list
Le 2010-11-20 16:20, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:
So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process
of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such
as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for
Le 2010-11-19 04:36, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 23:39 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote:
Now this is something we can work with. Tomorrow I will try to integrate
this into the wiki, and as I have some time free I will launch into
designing an artwork workflow and publication sy
Le 2010-11-21 05:13, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 03:50 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
We have been gently reminded that "marketing ideas" should reside on the
"Marekting/ideas wiki pages. For the sake of consistency, could you add
your idea to the http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/
Le 2010-11-21 11:23, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 06:13 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
I propose that we keep the "ideas" section, but that we have two
internal sections: one section for "design related ideas" and another
with "marketing-related ideas". This will keep it simple and b
Le 2010-11-21 06:19, Michael Wheatland a écrit :
I have created a workflow summary from the information gathered from
this thread.
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design team to see examples of projects
that the design team have comp
Le 2010-11-22 04:17, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:29 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
Personally I think that this type of organisation is a bit too late
unless everyone is on board and most of OOo members are used to working
under the common understanding of Marketing and Design un
On 11/20/2010 07:58 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
* Ideas: area where team members can chat in public as well as a private
area; public and private mailist; white board area to comment on design
graphs or to rough sketch live for examples ... collaborative if
possible (where other members can contribute
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 20:30 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> > * Workflows / Procedures: work in progress
>
> Again, work in progress should be on the wiki.
>
> The web site cannot contain work in progress, as it should be the
> basic
> source of information about TDF and LibreOffice, and people ar
On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:
So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process
of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such
as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for
delivery of a system that performs in the way
On 11/20/2010 08:46 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Have you ever had an artwork contributor send a photoshop file for the
team to look at? If so, the Drupal site Team Devs will test the site to
make sure that there are no hiccups if this is ever done. The list is
not to support any of the files formats bu
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 22:20 +0100, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> I do not mind what happens before the publication on the web site
Right - and that is the key descriptor, publication.
Your speaking as if there is only one view of the web site, there is not
when under the control of a CMS system. There i
I found it very hard to follow this conversation. Can we take a step back.
The marketing list should not be the place for discussing website
infrastructure.
Quote of Initial email
>Needed: Please feel free to add any individual team requirements for the
final Drupal based website. All requirement
On 11/20/2010 10:56 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
This is what the Silverstripe and Drupal sites are all about. A one stop
shop place where everything is available under one roof but also where
all is built according to permissions to users as to what levels of the
website they may work on or see.
Then
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 03:50 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> We have been gently reminded that "marketing ideas" should reside on the
> "Marekting/ideas wiki pages. For the sake of consistency, could you add
> your idea to the http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Ideas
> page?
Sure, but shoul
On 11/20/2010 11:49 PM, drew wrote:
Your speaking as if there is only one view of the web site, there is not
when under the control of a CMS system. There is a view that is
published, official in other words
Please remember that I behave like a user (and sometimes like a
journalist) and not l
OK,
Sorry this has taken a little while, but I have been busy with paid
work over the last week more than normal.
I have created a workflow summary from the information gathered from
this thread.
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design t
Hi Marc, all,
it's hard to follow general decisions down in threads on Drupal.
Marc Paré schrieb:
[...] Now that we essentially have 2 groups: [Marketing] and
[Design], do we want an "ideas" section in both? Or would we rather have
on "ideas" section where we can see the whole range of ideas?
Hi Michael, *
Michael Wheatland schrieb:
[...]
I have created a workflow summary from the information gathered from
this thread.
In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
allow people outside of the design team to see examples of projects
that the design team have comple
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:49 +0930, Michael Wheatland wrote:
> In addition to this we can build a 'exhibition system' which would
> allow people outside of the design team to see examples of projects
> that the design team have completed, but that is the next step, we
> need to build the groundwork
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 06:13 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> I propose that we keep the "ideas" section, but that we have two
> internal sections: one section for "design related ideas" and another
> with "marketing-related ideas". This will keep it simple and both teams
> will be aware of what projec
Hi all,
Sorry if this might feel like an empty answer - but since I am travelling at
the moment, I would like to avoid lengthly mails written on tiny keyboards.
So just a: I do have some thoughts how some topic structuring might work. Both
for the Design team stuff and the tooling like the wiki
Michael Wheatland wrote:
It can be hard at times to trust another group with something you are
dependant on, but I assure you that the system will be very functional
and easy to use for non-technical people.
This is not a problem for me. I am used trust others as I do not have a
technical bac
Hi Marc, Thorsten, *
Marc Paré schrieb:
Le 2010-11-21 11:23, Thorsten Wilms a écrit :
[...]
Design vs Marketing, yes.
If you apply some of the broader definitions, you can both conclude that
Design touches everything and also that Marketing touches everything.
Originally marketing may have bee
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:29 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> Personally I think that this type of organisation is a bit too late
> unless everyone is on board and most of OOo members are used to working
> under the common understanding of Marketing and Design understanding.
You mentioned philosophical
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 16:29 -0500, Marc Paré wrote:
> Personally I think that this type of organisation is a bit too late
> unless everyone is on board and most of OOo members are used to working
> under the common understanding of Marketing and Design understanding.
You mentioned philosophical
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 01:28 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> I think they cover quite clearly what they want to say, so I'd keep them.
If they would, there would be no question whether design should sit
below marketing or not. There would be no questions if the logo or a
brochure belongs to marke
Hi Italo,
I feel a need to second your statements ;-)
Am Sonntag, den 21.11.2010, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
> We cannot decide where people will navigate, and which information
> they will access from which web site. Of course, we will cross
> reference the two web sites, but I think tha
On 11/24/2010 10:57 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:
The web site is not intended to please the people who belong to the
community, but to attract new people (new community members, and new
software users) and to communicate with stakeholders (individuals and
companies/organizations interested in deal
32 matches
Mail list logo
