[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-30 Thread Immanuel Giulea
I figured out how to create pages, so I started by creating: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Selling_points and https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Selling_points_MSO an hour later, I also found:

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-30 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Immanuel, Just leave the feature comparison page where it is; perhaps you could focus on a more synthetic document, and one that takes into account broader points (not just feature by feature)? Thanks, Charles. Le 30.12.2012 17:51, Immanuel Giulea a écrit : I figured out how to create

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-30 Thread Boudi van Vlijmen
I'll check it out with my OpenERP network. Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, Boudi van Vlijmen http://www.vanvlijmen.nl *Open standards or Open Wallets that is the question!* http://forumstandaardisatie.nl/ Beleidsquote Rijksdiensten moeten vanaf april 2008 ODF ondersteunen. Mede-overheden

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-30 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Immanuel, Thanks for your initiative and input for this! Immanuel Giulea wrote (29-12-12 22:04) What are the plans on CIMS for LO 4.0 ? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.0#Core I've some documentation from some years back. Will try next weeks (overloaded, sorry) to see

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-30 Thread Immanuel Giulea
From the 4.0 Release Notes, I understand that LO is aiming to compatible with CIMS protocol. I'll try to take a deeper look at this. Don't know enough about the CIMS protocol right now. On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote: Hi Immanuel, Thanks for your

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-29 Thread Boudi van Vlijmen
Congratulations! The good news is: Microsoft takes the effort to write a document against LOOO! If there is no threath, there is no reason to do so! - OpenERP integrates best with LibreOffice and OpenOffice ( http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/book/8/8_20_Config/8_20_Config_reports.html) and

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-29 Thread Immanuel Giulea
OpenERP mentions explicitely OO but nothing about LO. Since LO is the improved version of OO, has anyone considered to contact the people from OpenERP to get them to update their docs? If we arguing in favor of integration with the product, we need their docs to be update so we can back up

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-29 Thread Immanuel Giulea
According to the blog of Alfresco, LO is now offering integration as experimental feature: http://blogs.alfresco.com/wp/wabson/2012/11/01/cmis-support-in-libreoffice-experimental-features/ What are the plans on CIMS for LO 4.0 ? I think this is a great feature and selling point vs MSO. Immanuel

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-29 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 12/29/12 7:36 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: I really would like to know how much MSO feels that LO and OOo are going to take their market away for them to spend time to make this second version of this document. I made some rough calculations back in 2009, when OOo numbers peaked before

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [tdf-discuss] Marketing material suggestion: Why LibreOffice?

2012-12-29 Thread Jay Lozier
On 12/29/2012 03:24 PM, Boudi van Vlijmen wrote: Congratulations! The good news is: Microsoft takes the effort to write a document against LOOO! If there is no threath, there is no reason to do so! - OpenERP integrates best with LibreOffice and OpenOffice (