[libreoffice-marketing] Re: Installation->Linux mentions release 3.3 and 3.4

2012-11-18 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2012-11-18 11:17, Cor Nouws a écrit : Cor Nouws wrote (16-11-12 18:15) We would have to have someone check with the .deb install procedures to make sure they have not changed since the last page update. [...] I can do that this weekend. As far as I can tell, it's OK for Debian based inst

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: Installation->Linux mentions release 3.3 and 3.4

2012-11-16 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2012-11-16 10:31, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : With Ubuntu, I have to use the Terminal to install LO with the "dpkg -i *.deb" command, since it will not install correctly any other way. I do not know how to get all the files to install via Dolphin or other file manager. I just get "depende

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: Installation->Linux mentions release 3.3 and 3.4

2012-11-16 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2012-11-16 12:15, Cor Nouws a écrit : Hi Marc, Marc Paré wrote (16-11-12 13:21) If we all agree to the above, I would be willing to go ahead with the changes. Great idea to do the clean-up etc! We would have to have someone check with the .deb install procedures to make sure they have n

Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Installation->Linux mentions release 3.3 and 3.4

2012-11-16 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
On 11/16/2012 09:55 AM, Marc Paré wrote: Le 2012-11-16 09:28, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : I remember seeing an install direction for a Linux package that has the "generic" information instead of the current numbering system. It worked well enough. YET, for some users, you might need to stat

[libreoffice-marketing] Re: Installation->Linux mentions release 3.3 and 3.4

2012-11-16 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2012-11-16 09:28, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : I remember seeing an install direction for a Linux package that has the "generic" information instead of the current numbering system. It worked well enough. YET, for some users, you might need to state . . . . "LibO_#.#.#_Linux_x86_install-r