Tom Davies wrote (05-10-12 14:45)
[...] They don't try to claim the
exciting one is more stable than the stable one. [...]
There are areas in which the latest series (3.6) is more 'stable' then
the previous one (3.5).
And areas where there is no difference.
And areas where the older is
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Tom,
Hoping this will be the last time we discuss this on the marketing list,
and so that we can move on to actual marketing topics and work
To be fair to Tom, this is also a recurring topic from others. So, when
I have time,
Hello Marc,
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2012 à 06:41 -0400, Marc Paré a écrit :
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Tom,
Hoping this will be the last time we discuss this on the marketing list,
and so that we can move on to actual marketing topics and work
:)
From: Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 11:41
Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06
On 10/05/2012 06:41 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Tom,
Hoping this will be the last time we discuss this on the marketing list,
and so that we can move on to actual marketing topics and work
To be fair to Tom, this is also a recurring
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 11:41
Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw: [tdf-announce]
The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Tom,
Hoping
...@documentfoundation.org
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 13:11
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
[tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
Hello Marc,
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2012 à 06:41 -0400, Marc Paré a écrit
@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 13:19
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
[tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
On 10/05/2012 06:41 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit
On 10/5/12 2:31 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
What is the problem? Why can't we be honest? Why even mention
anything about stability in public announcements!?!!
We are honest and transparent. Each new version is more stable than the
previous one of the same family, and solves bugs and regressions,
Hi,
What instead of debating on whether the two branches are stable or not,
can't we just qualify them as two differently oriented solutions ?
One version for the average user, one version for the enterprise. The older
one being for the enterprise of course.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM,
On 10/5/12 3:04 PM, Florian Monfort wrote:
One version for the average user, one version for the enterprise. The older
one being for the enterprise of course.
The problem is that there are enterprises happy with the old version and
other happy with the new version, and individual users
:)
From: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com
To: tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org; marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 13:58
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
[tdf-announce
When it comes to communicate, unless we are on a specific campaign, I'd
rather focus on what's general.
I don't I'm making any mistake by saying that the average user will need
something a little more edgy to have better functionality ? Especially when
it comes to LibreOffice I'd rather encourage
...@documentfoundation.org;
marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 5 October 2012, 14:10
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Stable? Seriously?? Fw:
[tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6.2
On 10/5/12 3:04 PM, Florian Monfort wrote:
One version for the average user
Hi Tom, Charles,
Le 2012-10-05 08:31, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
There is already a wiki-page! The graphic clearly backs up what i have been
saying. Presumably the graphic is wrong but wont get replaced and the new page
will just contradict the graphic. The public announcement contradicts
On 10/05/2012 09:04 AM, Florian Monfort wrote:
Hi,
What instead of debating on whether the two branches are stable or not,
can't we just qualify them as two differently oriented solutions ?
One version for the average user, one version for the enterprise. The older
one being for the
Hi :)
What is the point of having 2 branches?
It's like we have 2 product-lines. One is green and the other is red. When we
try to sell a new release of the red product-line we say it's greener. Why
can't we just say it's red? Take pride in it's redness. Can't we point out
the
17 matches
Mail list logo
