Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

On 21 April 2016 at 09:36, Sean DALY wrote: > what's the best way to comment/point out an issue? Do I need to create an > account with Github or will my SL wiki account work? Yes, create a github account and file issues in https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs/issues

Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

Hi I'm confused :) The www-sugarlabs repo hasn't been updated for 19 days? How was the site changed? On 21 April 2016 at 09:18, Sean DALY wrote: > Hi Dave > > I'm not being negative, just surprised that the site was changed. My ideal > process is to involve marketers in

Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

Hi Dave I'm not being negative, just surprised that the site was changed. My ideal process is to involve marketers in marketing, but that's very unusual for FLOSS projects :-) In fact the homepage does cycle the logo variants - that's good! There are typos in the text though... who can fix

Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

Hi On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY wrote: > I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already. > I would like to ask you to be more positive about the new members of the community being enthusiastic about contributing. > FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for

Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Juan Carlos Murillo wrote: > Also, if there is a range of different colors for the logo, then a good > idea might be to use the same logo color for the websites that have more > related content between them (i.e. homepage and activities).