>
>
>>>
>> Did you think about run for a seat in the SLOB?
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/2014-2015-candidates
>>
>
> I have considered it, but there are two obstacles:
>
> First, my current employer requires me to obtain permission from them to
> be on the board of a non-profit
All are good questions.
Some replies below.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Samuel Greenfeld
wrote:
> Looking at past minutes, I think I am proposing more of a change in
> procedure than topics for the oversight meeting. We need to get more
> people involved than are present in the IRC meetin
Hmm, don't want throw cold water on that, but reading
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31834927
looks like they already include something called Touch Develop,
developed by Microsoft!
Anyway, times changed (just a little) and is open source, and is in github
https://github.com/Microsoft/Touc
If you want, I can translate it to Spanish.
(I will be available until Friday afternoon)
Gonzalo
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> Walter has forwarded a couple of quotes for Monday's PR.
>
> If we publish on the wire early Monday morning, deadline is 6pm EST this
> Friday.
>
Maybe we can join them too.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
> http://pockey.dao2.com/2013/11/education-freedom-day-celebrations-18-january-2014/
>
> Sad that Sugar is not even mentioned.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>
>
> __
To be fair, is not _only_ about marketing.
I don't know how much people is in the marketing mailing list, I just
recently discovered it.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
> yet another marketing thread on the sugar-devel list
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
I also think w should change the major number when we have something
different to show (when we achieved the goal)
Gonzalo
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Thanks, I now see where I was confused... Normally in developer versioning
> you bump the major number when you ach
At least the virtualbox looks doable and a good way to show Sugar.
Gonzalo
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>> The larger problem is the absence of a marketing strategy, we need to
>> know where we are going to communicat
Sean,
Usually, we are not doing big changes, but incremental changes.
We are closer to the reality of the linux kernel, where the change to 3.0
was not related to changes itself, but to the numbers where not comfortable,
and they are planning release version 4.0 by the same reason in one year.
Wha
7;s best :)
>
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> As said before, a name only, is not good to indicate progression
>> (at least the name is "The Third" and so :)
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:0
let" (or something - this needs
>> marketing
>> >>> work), with a clear story: Sugar opens up a new direction after seven
>> years
>> >>> of production.
>> >>>
>> >>> The existing technical version numbering system has the
transmit.
For us, is another tag in git
Gonzalo
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Yup
>
>
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> Maybe "Sugar Web" instead of "Sugar Online"?
>> We have
an't market. Or perhaps become
>> irrelevant as Daniel N has suggested if we go to continuous development
>> mode.
>>
>> I have more grey hair than I did when I first proposed we go to v1 six
>> years ago [1]...
>>
>> (!)
>>
>> So I think we
iki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Notes
> Sean
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>>
>> Ok, I am not a marketing guy.
>>
>> May be you are right and v2 is better than v1,
>> but I am sure any of these is better than 0.102
>
continuous development
> mode.
>
> I have more grey hair than I did when I first proposed we go to v1 six years
> ago [1]...
>
> (!)
>
> So I think we are ready for v2.
>
> Sean.
>
> [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2008-November/000425.html
>
Yeah, is a option.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 00:37, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>>
>> In F18 we can do:
>> from gi.repository import WebKit2
>>
>> but later crash, not sure where.
>>
>
>
In F18 we can do:
from gi.repository import WebKit2
but later crash, not sure where.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
>> >
>>
There are errors:
"Proyecto de Escrotio Libre GNOME" must be "Proyecto de Escritorio Libre
GNOME"
"Los niños de Uruguay a Ghana serán capaces de utilizar sus XOs de aprender
y de mostrar a sus amigos y familias cómo usar Sugar y GNOME" must be
"Los niños de Uruguay a Ghana serán capaces de utilizar
18 matches
Mail list logo
