Yeah, is a option.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 00:37, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>>
>> In F18 we can do:
>> from gi.repository import WebKit2
>>
>> but later crash, not sure where.
>>
>
> Hrm, yeah, I had forgot the exact situation in Fedo
On 7 November 2013 00:37, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
> In F18 we can do:
> from gi.repository import WebKit2
>
> but later crash, not sure where.
>
Hrm, yeah, I had forgot the exact situation in Fedora 18...
Then I'm afraid the only solid approach I can think of is testing for a
SUGAR_WEBKIT_VER
In F18 we can do:
from gi.repository import WebKit2
but later crash, not sure where.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>
>> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
>> >
>> > If we want to support WebKit1,
On 6 November 2013 18:32, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >> No. the web-server issue is already solved.
> >
> > If we want to support WebKit1, I think we should do it upstream then. I'm
> > still not thrilled about that but not opposed to it either.
>
> Good. We can see what is the better way to do it.
Gstreamer 0.10 is part of what I'm calling gtk2 toolkit, it's not
completely accurate but we have been using than terminology. So it seems we
are going to run into the issue of gtk2 toolkit pieces disappearing earlier
then I expected.
I think you can move to gst 1.0 only if you already ported to g
On 6 November 2013 17:38, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> >
> > On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
> >> >
> >> > Please elaborate :)
> >> >
> >> > I thi
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I forgot a note about toolkits
>
> * The gtk2 toolkit is deprecated and frozen but it will be supported as long
> as possible (at some point I guess some dependencies might start
> disappearing from distributions, making that problematic). Th
On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> >>
> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18.
> >
> > Please elaborate :)
> >
> > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms
> (WebKit1
> > and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain)
On 6 November 2013 16:12, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > * Wait and see what happens with the XO. Support existing deployments by
> > producing images with the most recent Sugar release. Stick to a Fedora 18
> > base system, the work to upgrade is highly non trivial. Provide custom
> rpms
> > for the
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think Sugar Labs needs to express a clear, realistic technology roadmap.
>> For example, we have been talking a lot about Sugar on Android, mixing a lot
>> of different
10 matches
Mail list logo
