Re: [Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

A few observations/thoughts that may help us in focusing our marketing efforts: (1) The primary source of push back in AU re Sugar was the browser. Schools had websites that they were interested in accessing that were not supported by Browse at the time. This is something we can turn around in

Re: [Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

On 24 June 2016 at 06:33, samson goddy wrote: > I think it's important to use some of the 10,000 $ to maintain and push > the marketing sector forward. Like the Social manager role i proposed. what > do you guys think? > There is no $10,000 today; the point was to

Re: [Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

On 23 June 2016 at 22:01, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > >> On 23 June 2016 at 10:31, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: >> > Perhaps we should ask marketing to do a SWOT (Strengths Weaknesses

Re: [Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

On 23 June 2016 at 10:44, Walter Bender wrote: >> Perhaps we should ask marketing to do a SWOT (Strengths Weaknesses >> Opportunities Threats) analysis. However we might not have enough funds for >> more than an online survey of current/past users and indirect friends of

Re: [Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > Historically there have been several organizations financially supporting > Sugar development. > > But at least some of those have left, others have reduced their > contributions, and it is unclear to me if any new

[Marketing] The End of Sugar (thought exercise)

Historically there have been several organizations financially supporting Sugar development. But at least some of those have left, others have reduced their contributions, and it is unclear to me if any new groups have made significant tangible investments in the project. The XO laptop and icon,