Re: automatic move to next spreadsheet

2013-05-23 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > -Original Message- > From: JW LISTER [mailto:sa...@jwlister.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:54 PM > To: marketing@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: automatic move to next spreadsheet > > Dear Sir > I use Openoffice spreadsheets and would find it handy if the next or > fo

Re: automatic move to next spreadsheet

2013-05-23 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:23 PM > To: OpenOffice Marketing > Subject: Re: automatic move to next spreadsheet > > I am not sure how can we predict ther is a BASK012 You can separate the file

Public uncertainty about the role of Oracle

2013-07-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, I myself am not directly in the (international) marketing active, but there is a point which, in my opinion, deserves attention: In public, at least in Germany, there are still uncertainties about the legal situation in OpenOfffice. Repeating is always the talk of the OpenOffice still be

Re: Public uncertainty about the role of Oracle

2013-07-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Do you think the person saying this is honestly confused? Or is he > intentionally spreading FUD? Sometimes it probably is FUD, but more often genuine ignorance. Please understand that it deals with an ordinary user, not experts. > Any press abou

Re: Public uncertainty about the role of Oracle

2013-07-26 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > > I know not what else we can do, but I wanted to inform you > of the problem. > > It may be that this problem in the U.S. (or elsewhere) does > not exist, but here in Germany it is exist. > > > > Possibly. Big American software companies are not

Re: Think Marketing, WAS: Re: 80 million downloads

2013-12-01 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Louis Suárez-Potts [mailto:lui...@gmail.com] > And that as LO and AOO are functionally very similar, any > support company stands to gain—they do not have to limit > themselves only to AOO or LO; we, at least, probably won't > enforce such a draconian limitation and we, at lea

Re: OpenOffice Weekly News

2014-04-18 Thread Jörg Schmidt
on Monday, April 14, 2014 7:37 PM Rob Weir wrote: > In another thread I pointed to an interesting thing the CouchDb > project was doing on their blog: > > https://blogs.apache.org/couchdb/entry/couchdb_weekly_news_april_3 > > I suggested doing something similar for AOO, perhaps by collecting > st

Re: OpenOffice Weekly News

2014-04-20 Thread Jörg Schmidt
on Friday, April 18, 2014 4:06 PM Rob Weir wrote: > > What do you think what is the target group that is? Only > project members, or interested OpenOffice users [*] who want > to stay up to date? > > > > I think it would be a mix of two audiences: > > 1) Project members who focus on one are of

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-23 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Alexandro, *, > From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Alexandro Colorado > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 5:55 PM > To: OpenOffice Marketing > Subject: What are we doing about Munich? > > Even if the story is not completely what was initially reported. Ther

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-23 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > Is there any documentation, reports, or things that can serve as a > research material for people outside of germany. (blog posts, > articles, discussions, prefferably in english) I know on this issue unfortunately only German-language

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-24 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > And that's part of the problem. We need AOO-german nationals to work > on transfering that communication into english (not only translate but > present it). Otherwise we are behind a language paywall (and yes I > know Gtranslate is goo

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-24 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > Yes but the damage most time is NOT local. And that makes us act > globally and locally. There was a big misstransalation of the news > mainly because of sensationalist titles that affect the global > perception of Open source (not jus

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-24 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > If you havent really read all the articles, the media is backpedalling > from what it was a greatly missconstrude headline news. I have read many articles, although certainly not read all. Above all, I know the situation in Munich ve

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-25 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > > I could even write something about it, because to me the situation > > is well known. Would it be quite useful to do that? Perhaps > as a blog > > post in https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/? > > Please do. If you don't have the rights to publi

Re: What are we doing about Munich?

2014-08-25 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On > I have very good ties with the people from The Linux Action Show > podcast[1], they were talking about this issue in Germany and would be > interested if you could be a guest for interview about the situation > and maybe help get more

Re: open office template redistribution

2014-09-10 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, From: Magnus Gernlein [mailto:m...@vorlagen.de] > i am representing vorlagen.de, a german online-shop for forms and > templates of all sorts. we would like to offer open office > templates to our visitors (free download of course). can we freely > do this or is any kind of tre

Re: unofficial?

2014-09-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > I can't share details, but this has been under investigation for some > months (yes, trademark issues take long, unfortunately, especially > against "smart" guys). What Joerg writes remains mostly > correct: it is > possible to r

Re: unofficial?

2014-09-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > In my view, the icons are part of the software and can be > used under the Apache > license. I mean that quite practical because the icons are part of eg > "soffice.exe", so part of the real software. Suppleme

Re: unofficial?

2014-09-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2014 3:10 PM > To: marketing@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: unofficial? > > Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > when I say the icons are _part of the softwa

Re: unofficial?

2014-09-21 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > You can buy a copy of Microsoft Windows, but that does not > mean you can use > the logo on your website. That is clear, but Microsoft is an interesting keyword regarding Licensing issues. Microsoft claims for himself as the right of the screens

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

2014-10-28 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Regina, > From: Regina Henschel [mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de] > I've got "StarWriter 2.0 Compact" with one of my first PCs. > The CD from > 1994 is still readable. It contains a version for Win and one > for OS/2. > Both together around 11MB. But that are binaries of cause, no sour

Re: I'm constructing a website to promote Calc

2015-01-14 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > I am starting a mini website to help Excel users convert to Calc: > The page will include the official (inside Calc for Linux) > descriptions > of each function (example: ABS - "Absolute value of a number"). > I was wondering if there is a ready made list I could use, > and not have

Re: OpenOffice Events calendar needs community help!

2015-09-06 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Just a reminder that we have an OpenOffice Events calendar that could > use some updating. This calendar on the Cwiki needs participation by > everybody to keep it up to date. Anyone of our community attending an > open source event is c

Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

2016-07-11 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Suminda Dharmasena [mailto:sirinath19...@gmail.com] > This is exactly what I had in mind also. Ok, but: then (imho), this has nothing to do with Apache, and need not be discussed here, because that is the normal open source way. And let me say, for clarity: I meant in my post

I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3

2016-10-09 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, I have translated the release notes in German and I get the following idea: We need an press release on AOO 4.1.3, because: - to counter the existing rumors to AOO - To say something to 4.1.3 (this version was also meant to rearrange internal processes in the project, which should be ex

Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3

2016-10-09 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > I working already with Apache for a press release. Thank you, these are good news. Please let me know if I can help with a German translation of the press release, because public relations is, in this times, important for Germany. You (Marcis) kn

Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3

2016-10-09 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > You (Marcis) ... Sorry, I meant: You (Marcus) ... Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mar

This can not be true

2016-10-12 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Apache, Hello OpenOffice-PMC, Hello Community, I am absolutely horrified that in a situation where we have to overcome problems together, no reasonable planning takes place. How can it be that even though *there was a help offer for the translation*, a press release is simply published in

Re: This can not be true

2016-10-13 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Two thing must be said: there was no time for coordination since the > press release had been accidentally made available before the planned > date; and the press release is traditionally kept confidential before > issuing it (whi

Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> Page created at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 > +Announcement > ; people interested in translating it can add a child page for their > language. the german translation is ready: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65876043 @Mar

Re: This can not be true

2016-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > thanks for your translation. Please exchange the quoted text > parts into > the following: > > "... ist eine gelegentliche Stille nicht ungewöhnlich ..." > > "... Das war bis vor kurzem auch bei OpenOffice der Fall ..." done Jörg -