We are happy with the default GNOME logo
http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines , yes. The only comments were about
having it bigger than now in the who homepage.
El dc 09 de 08 del 2006 a les 18:58 +0100, en/na LeeTambiah va escriure:
> Are we still using the usual logo for the new wgo? Or is ther
Hey all,
Jorge and I are headed to LWE:SF next week and I discovered that we
have no banners. I thus decided to take this into my own hands and get
one printed. However, I need feedback on the attached file within 3
hours, in order for them to get it printed by Monday, for me to go.
Corey
offi
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 17:01:23 +0200
Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I shouldn't be talking about navigation bars yet, but I'll try. This
> structure could bring us to a nav bar like this:
>
> [GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work - Join - Enjoy!
>
[snip]
You may like to consider 'Create'
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 16:28 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> --- Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:19:18 +0100 (BST)
> > Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Install" is a great idea.
Problem is you don't "Install" a live CD... I think this should be mor
Are we still using the usual logo for the new wgo? Or is there another
one we are using...
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
--- Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:19:18 +0100 (BST)
> Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > None taken :)
> >
>
> Thanks. :-)
>
> > I'm trying to think in terms of paths through the
> > site. My scenarios are these:
> >
> > * new to GNOME: a
> Cool! I also used a path model:
I agree on this path. It's the Road to Enlightenment I suggested for the
use cases. :)
I shouldn't be talking about navigation bars yet, but I'll try. This
structure could bring us to a nav bar like this:
[GNOME logo] Know - Try - Learn - Work - Join - Enjoy!
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:19:18 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> None taken :)
>
Thanks. :-)
> I'm trying to think in terms of paths through the
> site. My scenarios are these:
>
> * new to GNOME: about, why choose, tour, screenshots
> * new users: tour, link to library,
Joachim, first of all don't worry if 'your' deadline is past. The site
structure is key and we will put on it the time needed.
Claus said:
> > the differences in his proposal that I
> > find useful can easily be merged back into the old
> > one.
Joachim said:
> My draft is just that, a draft, and
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 12:58 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Maybe it's useful to remember that the products.html page was in the
> 'About' section: The navigation of the product pages needs some serious
> thought unless we want to go deeper than a 3 level navigation or make
> 'Products' a top-level
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:29:39 +0100 (BST)
Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At first glance this looks good. I like the way points
> are laid out.
>
> 'It's reliable. Granted.'
>
> 'Granted' doesn't mean what you think it does in this
> context. It sort of means 'I grudgingly concede
> Is it possible to subscribe to /GnomeWeb and *all* it's sub-pages in one
> go?
The subscribe box is just a list of regexps. "/GnomeWeb.*" should do it.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
"Just because I sit in front of a terminal al
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:46:02 +0200
Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Claus, if I'm missing other drafts you have provided about product
> pages please let us know.
>
No, I don't think so.
Maybe it's useful to remember that the products.html page was in the
'About' section: The navigation
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 00:07 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> BTW, I recommend all the goal coordinators to subscribe to the wiki
> pages they are maintaining, so they know instantly about the updates.
> Very useful, specially when mailing lists are confusing. ;)
Is it possible to subscribe to /GnomeWeb
--- Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, I have a draft about the why; reformulated
> from existing
> pages. It's attached. A native English speaker is
> probably able
> to refine the basic idea without problems; I just
> picked the words in
> the headers because of their, well,
--- Claus Schwarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong. I think most points of the
> former proposal are
> > valid and should be kept in the current wgo
> revamp. See
> > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/NewWgoStructure ,
> I'm asking for
> > selecting and merging. Why don't you work to
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:33:38 +0200
Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pragmatism: it is sensible to say that Evolution needs to be featured
> somewhere in wgo. And we are going to have a list of featured
> products. Let's move forward.
>
You're leading. It's your decision.
> Now that th
GnomeWeb/SoftwareMap is now http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/GnomeProducts
I've tried to summarize there the agreements, the planning work needs to
concentrate now on the "draft" sections and the update of deletion of
the "Needs update" section. Hopefully this is something Simon can do
without much
Quim Gil wrote:
> - eZ: http://wgo.mgdm.net/
The admin bit for this is http://admin.wgo.mgdm.net. If anyone wants to
play with that, give me a shout off-list or on IRC (I'm mgdm in
#marketing) and I'll give you the password.
--
Cheers,
Michael
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gn
> Still no volunteers to check the CMSs.
I'm happy to provide a point of view from the sysadmin team.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
"We are peaking sexually when they are peaking. And two peaks makes a
hell
CMS sandboxes update:
- Tiki: http://gnome.rclaporte.com/
- eZ: http://wgo.mgdm.net/
- Plone: http://demo.gnome-cn.org/
- A Midgard sandbox is underway
- Can someone provide a Drupal fresh installation in a server with
direct access (for the admin)? ourproject.org is a gforge-based project
and we
El dt 08 de 08 del 2006 a les 22:33 -0400, en/na Marc Laporte va
escriure:
> > Can someone point me to a working implementation of this?
If someone could reply to
wgo L10n workflow
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-July/msg00232.html
it would be great.
The basic point now is:
22 matches
Mail list logo
