Hi,
First reactions, on a quick read:
Please don't put the technical justification API ABI break front
center. Users don't care, and it will be a handicap the next time we
want to bump major versions, even without an API break. Along the same
lines, I'd remove the API/ABI FAQ.
Better to be
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't put the technical justification API ABI break front
center. Users don't care, and it will be a handicap the next time we
want to bump major versions, even without an API break. Along the same
lines, I'd remove
Or to put this in a tighter nutshell:
firefox_developer we're going to rule (again) on mobile with a firefox product
firefox_developer because we're all user-focused
luis that was really my core critique of the GNOME 3.0 proposal
luis it is '3.0 because gtk is 3.0' rather than '3.0 because of
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or to put this in a tighter nutshell:
firefox_developer we're going to rule (again) on mobile with a firefox
product
To be clear, 'rule' here was meant as 'kick ass', not 'have power'.
Luis
--
marketing-list mailing list
Luis,
Luis Villa wrote:
So, yeah. When we've figured out how to make people tell it's a damn
upgrade, get back to me, until then, calling it 3.0 is a bad idea.
Sorry again for the stop energy, but when I see things plunging off a
cliff, and a huge opportunity wasted, I think it has to be
Hi,
Luis Villa wrote:
I'm sorry to be so negative, but this is a lousy idea and I think that
needs to be said. Do not repeat the mistakes of early 2.0 (before we
got our act together) and KDE 4.0. Be patient; just because Topaz is
unlikely to happen (I agree) is no reason to rush out and
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Luis, I think you were being a little harsh - GNOME's been lethargic
for so long, you're expecting to see us sprinting, when we're still at
the stage of learning to walk again.
I'm expecting us to walk and *then* talk
Luis Villa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Luis, I think you were being a little harsh - GNOME's been lethargic
for so long, you're expecting to see us sprinting, when we're still at
the stage of learning to walk again.
I'm expecting us to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:33:08AM -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
Or to put this in a tighter nutshell:
firefox_developer we're going to rule (again) on mobile with a firefox
product
firefox_developer because we're all user-focused
luis that was really my core critique of the GNOME 3.0 proposal
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:22:31AM -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, Luis, I think you were being a little harsh - GNOME's been lethargic
for so long, you're expecting to see us sprinting, when we're still at
the stage of
10 matches
Mail list logo
