Re: What's happening with writing content?

Ramon said: > Simone, David can you help on skinning ? ( we will finish PloneProduct > and Language issues later ) > I am really lacking effective time for wgo, I simply do not know enough about PLONE to be effective and efficient right now and wont be able to do much worthwhile in the time sp

Updated Component Page

I have added a proposal for the required elements in the footer for wgo at:- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ComponentSelection. Please see the page and suggestions would be welcomed. Cheers Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marke

Wgo home footer RSS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, After reading the comments from the component section today, we need to come to a conclusion as to what we want to do with the RSS Feeds within the home page footer. My idea is to have a link called "RSS Feeds" with NO icon. This link (whe

Home Page Footer Elements

I have proposed the elements that could be used on the home page footer. See the page at:- http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ComponentSelection?action=show Please add your suggestions to the page. Regards Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/li

Re: WGO Footer

Actually repeating links is a bad idea thinking about it. Most sites seem to add "contact us", "terms of use" "about" etc. We already have an "about" so I think a contact link would suffice wouldn't it? Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

WGO Footer

I would first like to get some feedback for the footer of the "WGO" Home Page. If we can come to an agreement as to what should be in the footer for the home we can then easily create one for the WGO Secondary page by cutting it down. Obvious Footer elements: *GNOME Logo *Copyright Add Extra: H

Re: WGO Revamp: Look and Feel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Quim Gil wrote: > Excellent work, Máirín! > > My general comment is that we need to distinguish better between promos > and infos. Slogan block, Featured product and Upcoming events are infos. > Perhaps rounded corners for promos and white backgrounds

Re: WGO Revamp: Look and feel

Máirín Duffy wrote: > LeeTambiah wrote: > >> The Primary bar needs to look like tabs see two sites for examples:- >> >> http://www.apple.com/ >> >> http://www.mysql.com/ >> > > Should I mock it up as tabs & using the GUADEC style as wel

WGO Revamp: Look and feel

The Primary bar needs to look like tabs see two sites for examples:- http://www.apple.com/ http://www.mysql.com/ Regards Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Re: WGO Revamp: Look and Feel

Máirín Duffy wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Using Lee's site structure wireframe mockup, I put together another > iteration of the WGO look & feel mockup: > > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/LooknFeel > > Below I'm going to highlight some issues and bring up some questions to > hopefully continue the

Re: layout Plan - feedback form

Quim Gil wrote: > Olav, read this through please. :) > > All pages will have a "Contact us" link in the footer. What Claus > suggests is different, and interesting. > > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 11:48 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote: > > >> "Did _this page_ provided the information you were looking for

layoutPlan svg updates

I have updated the LayoutPlan svg's, there is no major changes except I have centre aligned the layout. Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Re: layout Plan - feedback form

Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > LeeTambiah wrote: > >> Claus Schwarm has requested an extra block for the second page being a >> link to feedback form. I personally feel this is unnecessary as the >> user can get information from the about section. >> >>

layout Plan - feedback form

Claus Schwarm has requested an extra block for the second page being a link to feedback form. I personally feel this is unnecessary as the user can get information from the about section. Shall we go with this, drop it, or add as an optional component? Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketi

Re: Layout Plan

Joachim Noreiko wrote: > --- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on >> the page[1]. Should >> we apply the centre align to the home page also, at >> current it is left >> aligned. I think t

Layout Plan

The Secondary Page layout is now centre aligned on the page[1]. Should we apply the centre align to the home page also, at current it is left aligned. I think the home page should also be centre aligned like the Apple site[2]. [1] http://leetambiah.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

lookandfeel

It may be a good idea to produce impressions of each individual component first. Then when the components look and feel has been accepted they can be moved to make the mock-up. Lee -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

Joachim Noreiko wrote: > --- LeeTambiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages >> have been updated >> have been updated. I have added a new version of the >> secondary page >> "layoutPlanSecond

Re: LayoutPlan Clarification

The breadcrumb component has been dropped, and pages have been updated have been updated. I have added a new version of the secondary page "layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.3.svg". Download the .svg from http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/PageStructure. The layout plan may address the text concerns of large p

LayoutPlan Clarification

The Gnome Web Page Structure http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/PageStructure currently has two versions, layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.1.svg and layoutPlanSecondaryPage0.2.svg. Could we please clarify as to what version we want to go with. Quim, there has been some concern over the having the "related lin

Re: Secondary Nav Bar

karderio wrote: > Hi :o) > > On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 11:30 +0100, LeeTambiah wrote: > >> It appeared to me yesterday, using the secondary navigation bar as a >> vertical component on the right hand side would be similar to the Ubuntu >> Site. >> >> http

Re: Secondary Nav Bar

Quim Gil wrote: > Right, this is an appropriate example. I have foun d another one at > http://www.sas.com/software/index.html (secondary nav in the left). > > I have two concerns with detached secondary nav bars: > > - They are detached :) and not always it is clear the dependency of > the secon

Secondary Nav Bar

It appeared to me yesterday, using the secondary navigation bar as a vertical component on the right hand side would be similar to the Ubuntu Site. http://www.ubuntu.com/support I think it works very well as a navigation system. We need to decide on this component, are we going with the secondar

Re: Secondary Nav Bar

Quim Gil wrote: > > Vertical or horizontal has a lot to do with taste, yes. I insist, my > objection is against a navigation that has primary bar horizontal and > secondary vertical. > > If you had to choose, would you have BOTH primary and secondary nav bars > horizontal or vertical in wgo? >

Re: Secondary Nav Bar

Quim Gil wrote: > You have an example at > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/your_money/default.stm > > where "Business" is the section in the primary nav bar and "Your Money" > is the page selected from the secondary nav bar. > > There are many examples of websites with General + primary + sec

Re: Secondary Navigation Bar

Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > How about we call them: > * GNOME navigation bar -- takes you to different > subsites in the GNOME web > * subsite navigation bar -- gets you around a > particular subsite. (Eg, what bugzilla currently has > as its only navigation bar) > * page navigation -- gets you to d

Re: Secondary Navigation Bar

Olav Vitters wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:52:10PM +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > [..] > >>> And ideally I want to use the same colors/layout of that for >>> Bugzilla. Maybe my answer was misinterpreted. I want do use the same >>> layout as www.gnome.org. However, if it is not possible I'

Re: Planet GNOME block (was Re: Page Layout Update)

Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> (2) Instead of posting post excerpts/subject lines on WGO, post other >> information. E.g., you could just post hackergotchis, the person's name, >> and how recently they said something on PGO, and where they are from. >> > > That's my preferred option, should

HTML Mockups

consistent. I'd imagine the coding is most likely going to be in PHP, as most CMS systems we are reviewing are PHP be based. My Page for requesting mock-ups http://live.gnome.org/LeeTambiah Page to add your mock-ups http://live.gnome.org/wgoMockups Regards L. Tambiah -- marketing-l

Latest Logo

Are we still using the usual logo for the new wgo? Or is there another one we are using... -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

wgo Mockup Page

I have added a "wgoMockups" page to add all ideas... http://live.gnome.org/wgoMockups Also someone has provided for some ideas http://goran.fimaks.net/moin.cgi/GnomeOrgMockup. These links can be found at my page http://live.gnome.org/LeeTambiah. I have began work on a mockup, but the

mockups continued...

>The CMS outputs webpages, and we want them to look GNOMEy. So we need a >design to create a template or theme from. Now I understand, well in that case then I think mockups should be made graphically. When the CMS has been chosen then the template can be made for the CMS via PHP, XHTML and CSS

wgo mock up required

Referring to http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/LooknFeel I would say from the examples we are looking for something like at http://www.java.sun.com in terms of the header and drop down menus. However the use of drop down menus is a concern for assess ability I tested the Java site and no drop down men