Re :o)
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 09:20 +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 22:06 +0200, karderio wrote:
> > The splash seems to use a distorted foot, when compared to the foot on
> > the top left of the site. This is to be avoided, according to the logo
> > guide
splash. Has GNOME got a new logo ? Is this
logo in different proportions to the old one ?
I've found few discussions about this new logo, I don't want to make any
further comments yet as things seem a little "fuzzy". I find the new
logo very good, btw.
Love, Karderio.
[1] h
Re :o)
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 18:06 +0100, LeeTambiah wrote:
> karderio wrote:
> > As a matter of interest, the sidebar on the Ubuntu website doesn't quite
> > behave consistently - on the support page (the one in your link), the
> > help section in the sidebar is perman
not to follow I think. With this type of
sidebar, I think it could be confusing for inexperienced web users to
see the "secondary" sidebar links, interspersed between the "primary"
links appear and disappear.
Love, Karderio.
[1]http://leetambiah.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/downloads/layoutPlanS
y/msg00004.html
Love, Karderio.
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 14:57 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > So, on the subject of pretty sites, is there any chance of anybody making
> > live.g.o not ugly (Jeff?) ? I still feel it is rather important...
>
> We need a moin 1.5 compatib
; the same in technical terms.)
Agreed, but discussion ongoing...
So, on the subject of pretty sites, is there any chance of anybody
making live.g.o not ugly (Jeff?) ? I still feel it is rather
important...
Love, Karderio.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
e as universally renowned as Ferrari
or China, I'm afraid it is still far from it. Again, it boils down to
who we are writing for, plus perhaps the fact that the definition of
GNOME can be elusive. Artful is the way to start the article gently for
the uninitiated without boring the rest.
Love,
ing if wgo is aimed at
end users at all, should we just have a link to the Ubuntu website for
example ? (That's a mix of joke, sarcasm and curiosity about what people
will answer :)
Love, Karderio.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Hi :o)
On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 00:04 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> Hi Karderio, thank you for challenging the home with good arguments. :)
>
> El ds 09 de 09 del 2006 a les 02:32 +0200, en/na karderio va escriure:
>
> > I certainly wouldn't put planet GNOME feeds on the front
those who
wish for such information.
Things should presented in ways to get potential users interested, as is
done on "big company" websites.
As previously mentioned, compare and contrast with :
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html
Love, Karderio.
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 17:
Hi :o)
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 13:10 +0200, Claus Schwarm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 02:08:09 +0200
> karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What could take the edge off the buzz a user should be feeling when
> > reading about GNOME ?
other site or in a new primary section.
I suppose the site will be displayed in the language sent by the users
browser...
Love, Karderio.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Perhaps the criticisms I have directed at the release notes are not
meant for them at all. The notes in fact being an excellent interim,
bolstering the "About GNOME" section, which manages to say piles about
GNOME's goals without ever saying what it does or what it looks like.
Lo
app, that stores site content in
a sqllite database (for example) and spits out static html. No messing
about on the server, and existing sites con just be copy pasted into the
software. I'm sure some hackers could find this useful ;)
Love, Karderio
>
> [1] http://glipper.sourceforge.net
Re :o)
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 23:42 +0200, AMAZIGH Aneglus wrote:
> 2006/7/14, karderio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Here are another two variations, with the font adjusted in what I think
> > is an acceptable manner.
>
> I prefer the new ones :)
> the GNOME text is mo
Re,
I swore never to do this in public, but fate being what fate is : here
is the attachment.
Sorry, I'm going to hide in a corner now.
Love, Karderio
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:33 +0200, karderio wrote:
> Hi :o)
>
> Here is my attempt at a large "Made for GNOME" but
the
other day. If we added news of major changes to the project page, you
would just have to monitor that page.
I do realise that this is light years from ideal, but perhaps it may
work some of the time...
Love, Karderio
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Hi :o)
Here is my attempt at a large "Made for GNOME" button.
Same questions apply ;o)
Love, Karderio
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Re :o)
Here are another two variations, with the font adjusted in what I think
is an acceptable manner.
I'll try and do a big brother button later, it will probably read "Made
for GNOME", for use on project pages, what do you think ?
Love, Karderio
gnome_80x15-3.png
Descrip
t too
ridiculously small :) So : which button is better ?
Love, Karderio
[1] http://www.zwahlendesign.ch/en/node/19
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
/ Buttons page [2] ?
Love, Karderio
[1] http://glipper.sourceforge.com
[2] http://www.zwahlendesign.ch/en/node/19
gnome_80x15.png
Description: PNG image
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Are there any other GNOME marketing materials, such as flyers posters
web-banners etc. ? If not, shouldn't there be ?
Love, Karderio
[1] http://glipper.sourceforge.com
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Ahem, didn't mean to send that as-is, please ignore the part asking for
extra materiel, I found it on the wiki.
Sorry.
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 01:14 +0200, karderio wrote:
> Hi :o)
>
> I was just looking for some "made for GNOME" buttons to put on the
> glipper website
argumentation as to it's
advantages as soon as I get time, but while waiting I just wanted
people to know it existed.
That said, I cannot know yet if Django would meet the requirements.
Love, Karderio
[1] www.djangoproject.com/
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
24 matches
Mail list logo
