Thanks Eugenia, I think now all the basic suggestions/requirements are
fulfilled.
I have moved the cooperation with gnomefiles.org goal to 2.16 -
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals - and linking to your site
providing your 100% free software feed is in the 2.16
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Sof
Ok, the special RSS feed for Gnome.org is in place:
http://www.gnomefiles.org/files/gnomefiles2.xml
The difference with the main RSS feed is that this version does not list
non-Free apps, and it always mentions what license is used for each
application.
If you instead you would like to create so
>o Provide a clearer visual recognition of software/application type
>vis-a-vis license or in simpler terms categorise apps based on
>license also
As I have already wrote, no closed source apps will be fed to
gnome.org. I can add the information regarding what license an app
uses in the rss feed t
Hi,On 7/14/06, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have this potential goal for the GNOME 2.18 release: Setting anofficial relation with gnomefiles.org -http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals
Long in coming but well here we are :) +1 Eugenia Loli,
gnomefiles.org maintainer, found it herself and h
Hi,
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> GnomeFiles.org is a GTK software repository. It might have the word
> "gnome" in it, but the goal was always to list all GTK-dependant
> applications. And that includes wxWidgets, Java SWT and other binded
> apps that depend on GTK. As GTK is LGPL, the goal was fro
Forwarding a Eugenia's email to the list, as requested.
--- Begin Message ---
you're also using a trademark without proper authorization!
I don't know what "proper authorization" would be (you mean, in writing?),
but the Gnome Board HAS discussed the Gnomefiles situation last year. This
is the
On 7/14/06, Eugenia Loli-Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(original message included below)
> >you're also using a trademark without proper authorization!
>
> I don't know what "proper authorization" would be (you mean, in writing?).
i guess so, i'm not a lawyer thank god :P
> but the Gnome B
On 7/14/06, Eugenia Loli-Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My
> reader's service is my goal, not politicalities.
those things you call "politicalities" might be important goals for
the project whose trademarked name you're taking for your website.
if you opened windowsfiles.com, microsoft woul
Ok, I made the change on gnomefiles regarding licenses. I have simplified
the licenses drop-down box a lot. There are only 4 non-Free licenses choices
now, and if one of these is picked, it will show up on its public page with
red characters indicating that this is not Free Software. Examples:
>> 3. Remove non-gnome, non-OSS apps. Gnomefiles is a software repository
>> for
>> all Gtk-dependant software, open or closed, black or white, thin or fat,
>> short or tall.
>
> This is the point which cause us to distance ourselves a little from
> gnomefiles last year, and it's still one I'm con
> At this point, I suggest a "high-level" cooperation of the two sites.
> Lets start by aligning policies and appearance. We can go for tighter
> integration after our first relaunch.
> This is probably necessary to "blend in" with the other gnome sites.
I don't have any plans to change the CMS/lo
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 00:34 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> Now, if it would be possible to also get a
> bookmark in Epiphany or an entry in a future Gnome RSS client, even better,
> but it's not really a requirement.
I've added gnomefiles as a default subscription to my application
PenguinTV
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:59 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> El dv 14 de 07 del 2006 a les 13:23 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va
> escriure:
>
> > This is probably necessary to "blend in" with the other gnome sites.
>
> Greg, before you go any further...
>
> gnomefiles.org is *not* a GNOME subsite and has
Hi,
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> A few things that _I can not_ do:
> 3. Remove non-gnome, non-OSS apps. Gnomefiles is a software repository for
> all Gtk-dependant software, open or closed, black or white, thin or fat,
> short or tall.
This is the point which cause us to distance ourselves a l
El dv 14 de 07 del 2006 a les 13:23 +0200, en/na Gergely Nagy va
escriure:
> This is probably necessary to "blend in" with the other gnome sites.
Greg, before you go any further...
gnomefiles.org is *not* a GNOME subsite and has no organic relation or
dependency with the GNOME project. They happ
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 01:13 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> >As I think is mentioned one one of the wiki pages, we need to reuse
> >information somehow, maybe with DOAP. Many people don't use gnomefiles.org
> >because we don't want to enter information in multiple places. I've mostly
> >stopped
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 00:34 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> >Can you please provide thoughts for an optimal collaboration with a
> >gnomefiles.org?
We are currently in the progress of rethinking pretty much everything
about Gnome's web presence, trying to keep the good parts and improving
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:13:35 -0700
"Eugenia Loli-Queru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gnomefiles has special needs for fields. If the DOAP standard can
> accomodate these (it was originally designed for Freshmeat AFAIK),
> and if someone help me out with the PHP part of pulling these
> correctly in
Em Sex, 2006-07-14 às 01:13 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru escreveu:
> >As I think is mentioned one one of the wiki pages, we need to reuse
> >information somehow, maybe with DOAP. Many people don't use gnomefiles.org
> >because we don't want to enter information in multiple places. I've mostly
> >stopp
> As I wrote to the email the marketing-list that hasn't got through yet (I
> can't seem to be able to register with this list), this is to be fixed.
> For
> example, a non-OSS license will be displayed in italics, in red color and
> maybe a popup window explaining that this is not open source. I a
>As I think is mentioned one one of the wiki pages, we need to reuse
>information somehow, maybe with DOAP. Many people don't use gnomefiles.org
>because we don't want to enter information in multiple places. I've mostly
>stopped using freshmeat for the same reasons.
Gnomefiles has special needs f
> We have this potential goal for the GNOME 2.18 release: Setting an
> official relation with gnomefiles.org -
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals
>
> Eugenia Loli, gnomefiles.org maintainer, found it herself and he
> contacted me. She is happy to help.
>
> Can you please provide thoughts for a
>Can you please provide thoughts for an optimal collaboration with a
>gnomefiles.org?
I would like to see either the XML feed used somewhere in the gnome.org site
so new Gnome users find out easily that there IS an active source that
provides GTK-dependant software. Now, if it would be possible
We have this potential goal for the GNOME 2.18 release: Setting an
official relation with gnomefiles.org -
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Goals
Eugenia Loli, gnomefiles.org maintainer, found it herself and he
contacted me. She is happy to help.
Can you please provide thoughts for an optimal coll
24 matches
Mail list logo
