Tom Cod:
No dude, that's not a defense that is very helpful as it assumes that this
happened and then makes excuses for it. Moreover, it is a slap in the face
to the millions of soviet soldiers and partisans who didn't do things like
that. I'm not sure what your experiences in war or milita
No dude, that's not a defense that is very helpful as it assumes that this
happened and then makes excuses for it. Moreover, it is a slap in the face to
the millions of soviet soldiers and partisans who didn't do things like that.
I'm not sure what your experiences in war or military life are
At 17:18 05/08/09 EDT, you wrote:
>
>Well, let's see. If, as I do, you consider rape a form of violence
yes...
>, and the
> purpose of war to inflict more violence on your enemy than they inflict on
>you
That sounds like a prescription for war crimes of every sort! War is
normally defended as ha
as used here more
generically, but imprecisely on a list where science is commonly discussed.
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, jscotl...@aol.com wrote:
From: jscotl...@aol.com
Subject: [Marxism] "Rape instinct"??
To: "jc"
Date: Wednesday, 5 August, 2009, 9:18 PM
Jeff, quoting me:
The n
Jeff, quoting me:
The notion that the Soviet troops would be shorn of the same human base
>instincts when involved in such a brutal war as any other troops are
>idealistic in the extreme.
Then writes:
I won't even start on this one
Reply:
Well, let's see. If, as I do, you consider r
At 16:40 05/08/09 EDT, jscotl...@aol.com wrote:
>
>The notion that the Soviet troops would be shorn of the same human base
>instincts when involved in such a brutal war as any other troops is
>idealistic in the extreme.
I won't even start on this one
- Jeff
_
