Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/7/2010 6:10 PM, S. Artesian wrote: It's interesting that Joaquin would use

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Short response to JB: I did not say, or at least it was not my intention to

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 7 June 2010 02:37, Joaquín Bustelo jbust...@bellsouth.net wrote: Thus Lenin's

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Well, thanks for that, but as I said to JB privately, I hope he has 60 more

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Shane Mage: In asserting that the relationships are between *countries*, rather

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Angelus Novus wrote: The second sense is just a fancy way of expressing the fact

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Lenin writes of the semi-colony, in a specific context, and as the world was

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis Proyect wrote: Nov 5 2007 16:43 #11 Angelus Novus User offline. Last seen

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Further thoughts from Angelus Novus inspired by a deeper reading of Kapital: Why

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == And exactly what does that have to do with the issues, data, definition, evidence

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Actually, it was a piece of shit academic phenomenologist journal that pretended at

Re: [Marxism] Is imperialism a different mode of production? [was Lula to Obama: Drop Dead]

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == /S. Artesian wrote/ It would help if could define what you mean by imperialism.

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == s.artesian wrote: And exactly what does that have to do with the issues, data,

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == What's not too bad, but all too revealing is that Louis claims to be interested in

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == s.artesian wrote: What's not too bad, but all too revealing is that Louis claims

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis Proyect: It is not too hard to figure out that he reflects confusion on

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis Proyect quoted from: Karl Marx letter to Nikolai Danielson, 1881 To

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/5/2010 7:00 PM, Angelus Novus wrote: A concrete analysis of the relation

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/6/2010 9:32 AM, s.artesian wrote: If people don't want to or are not able to

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/6/2010 9:51 AM, Louis Proyect wrote: It is also key to Teodor Shanin's Late

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Joaquín Bustelo wrote: adumbrating? ADUMBRATING???!!! There's never a

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/6/2010 2:22 PM, S. Artesian wrote: JB has yet to answer any of those

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:15 PM, Joaquín Bustelo wrote: No, it's because no matter

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == JB: And you're also not going to convince me to turn against the national movements

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 6/6/2010 5:33 PM, Shane Mage wrote: Is India an oppressed or oppressing nation?

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == s.artesian wrote: What's the big deal. Marx wrote like that. I wouldn't

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Jun 5, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Louis Proyect wrote: Sounds about right. Too bad

Re: [Marxism] Is Imperialism a different mode of production?

== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On the other hand, maybe this will