>
> I suspect that when people argue that Marxism is
> incompatible with Kantianism they have in mind
> such people as Eduard Bernstein or Nicolas Berdyaev
> who started out as Marxists but who over time
> drifted
> away from Marxism.
So the Bolsheviks said about Bernstein, but why think
they had
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:49:17 -0700 (PDT) andie nachgeborenen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> --- Paddy Hackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Paddy Hackett: I dont see how any serious marxist
> > can forge an argument by
> > using Kant's categorical imperative.
>
> It's talk like this th
It is just an idea. I could just as easily say the idea of humans as not
ends in themselves.
Paddy Hackett
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx
andthe thinkers he inspired'"
Sent: Thursd
--- Paddy Hackett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paddy Hackett: I dont see how any serious marxist
> can forge an argument by
> using Kant's categorical imperative.
It's talk like this that helped persaude mt that the
term "Marxist" is merely an impediment to clear
thinking and socialist practic
That's somebody else whose writing on Kant's categorical imperative.
Is the idea of humans as ends in themselves alien to Marxism ? What is the
idealist error in that.
Charles
Paddy Hackett: I dont see how any serious marxist can forge an argument by
using Kant's categorical imperative.
Charle
Paddy:
That was written by the people named in the post. You are going to have them
charging me with plagerism.
A materialist categorical imperative would be to save the world from
capitalism.
Charles
^^
Paddy Hackett
Charles Brown ( posting something somebody else wrote): Moreover, the
Charles Brown: Moreover, the moral injunction of the categorical imperative,
namely "act
only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law".
Paddy Hackett: I cannot see how the struggle for the abolition of wages
through the struggle for real inc
Paddy Hackett: I dont see how any serious marxist can forge an argument by
using Kant's categorical imperative.
Charles Brown: I am presently preparing/reworking the chapter in which I put
forward my
case for egalitarianism (my thesis is a critique of the New Classical Model
and Liberal Capitali
Charles, I agree with you entirely. After Gramsci's profound critique of
Bucharin's mechanist approach to dialectics, Bucharin's works must be read very
carefully and only for historical reasons rather than to understand what
dialectics are about.
Dogan
-Original Message-
From:
Rosa cites Bukharin as giving the best summary of Dialectical Marxism.
Ironically, at one point Lenin called Bukharin the Party's favorite , but
criticized him for lack of dialectics in his work. I guess it makes sense
that if Rosa is a critic of dialectics ,a weak dialectician would be the
best a
10 matches
Mail list logo
