State monopoly capitalism
Communism portal
v • d • e
The theory of state monopoly capitalism was initially a Marxist
doctrine popularised after World War II. Lenin had claimed in 1916
that World War I had transformed laissez-faire capitalism into
monopoly capitalism, but he did not publish any
CeJ jannuzi ]
>The
> Financial Times wrote months ago that the bailout was $ 11 trillion;<<
That's in committments--it looks like the US government just took over AIG's!
So far spent were a couple 1 trillion dolla
>The
> Financial Times wrote months ago that the bailout was $ 11 trillion;<<
That's in committments--it looks like the US government just took over AIG's!
So far spent were a couple 1 trillion dollar plus 'packages'--which,
btw, included more
funding for Iraq and Afghanistan.
If you want to sa
Speaking of predictions, there is this guy's book, which must have
been written 2005-6 and published in 2007.
The other thing we haven't discussed yet was Greenspan and then
Bernanke not being able to raise interest rates. The other other thing
would be so many profit-seeking but unproductive entit
Ahhh, spring 2008, it was an incredible time. Markets were going to
wash all our problems away and sort themselvs out. I have great
nostalgia for spring of 2008.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/business/14econ.html?_r=1
excerpt 1
Many specialists say policy makers can do only so much to protec
I guess one question would be, Are we already in the private equity
economy, and is that why there is so little growth and so few jobs? It
seems that investment interests tap into the American economy though
private equity, hedge funds and mortgage brokers. They tap into it to
get savings from bank
On 12/4/09, CeJ wrote:
> >>Before that there was the S & L bailout. Chrysler was bailed in
> 1979. However, this latest one strikes me as a quantitative change
> that is turning into a qualitative change, to coin a phrase. The
> Financial Times wrote months ago that the bailout was $ 11 trillio
>>Before that there was the S & L bailout. Chrysler was bailed in
1979. However, this latest one strikes me as a quantitative change
that is turning into a qualitative change, to coin a phrase. The
Financial Times wrote months ago that the bailout was $ 11 trillion;
and I think more money has go
On 12/3/09, CeJ wrote:
> Using the examples of what already happened under earlier presidents,
> there is nothing that surprising at all about the bank bailouts. As
> for the idea that it was unprecedented to bailout AIG (no one actually
> knows what to call it except it's something like GE withou
Using the examples of what already happened under earlier presidents,
there is nothing that surprising at all about the bank bailouts. As
for the idea that it was unprecedented to bailout AIG (no one actually
knows what to call it except it's something like GE without an
industrial arm), I would co
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin
CB: I know this guy is a rightwing libertarian, gold bug and all, but
I skimmed the second chapter of his book on the Federal Reserve, and
it read like a precise prediction from 2002 of the big bank bailout.
When I can borrow a copy , I'll copy s
11 matches
Mail list logo
