[Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

Hi Jim and others Perhaps you can help me here. How does the development of symbolic logic by BR and others apply to logical atomism. How does this logic relate to propositions and their relationship with each other Paddy Hackett ___ Marxism-Thaxis

[Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic logic

Hi While I am waiting to get a copy of another book on logic, I have Lemmon's one, can you recommend a web site where there are exercises, questions and solutions, for the student in logic? - Original Message - From: "Ralph Dumain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

>>> "rasherrs" Hi Jim and others Perhaps you can help me here. How does the development of symbolic logic by BR and others apply to logical atomism. How does this logic relate to propositions and their relationship with each other Paddy Hackett ^^^ CB: Russell was anti-dialectics ___

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:44:40 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Jim and others > > Perhaps you can help me here. How does the development of symbolic > logic by > BR and others apply to logical atomism. How does this logic relate > to > propositions and their relationship with

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

Theory of descriptions Jump to: navigation, search The theory of descriptions is one of the philosopher Bertrand Russell's most significant contributions to the philosophy of language. It is also termed Russell's Theory of Descriptions (often abbreviated as RTD). In short, Russell argued that t

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

Interesting intro Charles. Much appreciated Paddy - Original Message - From: "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic Theory of descr

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

reciated > > Paddy > > - Original Message - > From: "Charles Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 7:39 PM > Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic > > > Theory of descriptions > > Jump to: navigati

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

s to every sentence in a scientific work or what? Paddy - Original Message - From: "Jim Farmelant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 12:49 AM Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic Also see these posts on Marxmail from ten years ago: http://www.m

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell#Analytic_philosophy http://daniel.cohnitz.de/download.php?d41747e60573503029d688f3267cc6cf > > Paddy > - Original Message - > From: "Jim Farmelant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 12:49

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic

elant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:49 AM Subject: Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic Logic On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 10:45:09 +0100 "rasherrs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks Jim > > I have been reading On Denoting and stuff related to

Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Symbolic logic

This is a classic for people studying linguistics. One of the challenges in post-Chomsky linguistics has been the use of logics, since people who gravitate to linguistics might do so out of humanities, and have little or no background in logics (some philosophy departments might teach it, but many