Hi,
Sounds fine, though I would note that about half of the code that was in
numerical_methods originally came from cbook, not mlab. This code fits
equally well in mlab, so I don't have anything against putting it there.
Thanks for taking care of this - I have been busy with other things.
Cheer
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Tom Holroyd wrote:
> Repost; the list bounced my last attempt.
>
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 18:42 -0400, Tom Holroyd wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 20:40 +0200, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
>>> I would prefer something like the following options:
>>>
>>> fc={'orange': 2
>
> Well merging is obviously better. I wrote YAArrow to support
> plain-vanilla annotations. AFAIK, they are used nowhere else, so as
> long as we could come up with one arrow class that works with
> plain-vanilla and fancy annotations, that would be good. But it may
> be easier said than done.
Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
>> I believe you are looking for the scanline boolean algebra -- search
>> the antigrain demo page
>>
>> http://www.antigrain.com/demo/index.html
>>
>> for scanline_boolean.cpp. Of course, we would need to support the
>> other major backends too
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> Also a linear perceptual scale would work better than HSV but I don't
> know of one off hand.
L*u*v* or its cylindrical-coordinate cousin L*t*theta* (or LCH_uv). "Choosing
Color Palettes for Statistical Graphics" is a nice paper talking about an
implementation in R (althou
