On 2014/01/13 9:58 AM, Chris Beaumont wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I found some time to look at the votes from the "Plot or Not?"
> experiment Adrian Price-Whelan and I ran during SciPy last summer. You
> can take a look at my summary at
> http://datarazzi.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/plot-or-not-voting-r
Hi Everyone,
I found some time to look at the votes from the "Plot or Not?" experiment
Adrian Price-Whelan and I ran during SciPy last summer. You can take a look
at my summary at
http://datarazzi.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/plot-or-not-voting-results/, or
explore for yourself at http://plotornot.chr
On 2014/01/13 5:11 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> This looks quite good to me.
>
And to me. If the implementation works out well, this will be a very
nice and much needed refactoring.
Eric
> I'd like some feedback from Thomas Caswell, who's looked at this part of
> the code much more than I h
I can do Thursday.
Tom
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> It's probably a good time to schedule another matplotlib Google Hangout.
>
> Is this Thursday at 1500 UTC (10 am ET) too short notice for the usual
> candidates?
>
> I know there was discussion of getting Michie
It's probably a good time to schedule another matplotlib Google Hangout.
Is this Thursday at 1500 UTC (10 am ET) too short notice for the usual
candidates?
I know there was discussion of getting Michiel de Hoon on today (which I
just saw, unfortunately). Is there another time in the future tha
This looks quite good to me.
I'd like some feedback from Thomas Caswell, who's looked at this part of
the code much more than I have lately, but assuming he's ok, you have my
go ahead to start the implementation.
Cheers,
Mike
On 01/08/2014 10:55 AM, Federico Ariza wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
>
