Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP10: Modernizing the documentation

2012-09-04 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 5 September 2012 00:32, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I wonder if there's any possibility of using that on earlier versions (I > suspect not). Not easily, I think. You'd have to get introspection tools like IPython to separately check for a __signature__ attribute, and I suspect we'd feel that t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP10: Modernizing the documentation

2012-09-03 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 26 August 2012 18:19, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I understand the comments about the difficulty of introspection. The > reason it works the way it does is so that additional parameters can be > added to the artist layer without needing to update every single > plotting function. A real world

Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP10: Modernizing the documentation

2012-08-27 Thread Anton Akhmerov
Michael Droettboom writes: > > On 08/26/2012 05:33 AM, Anton Akhmerov wrote: > > Michael Droettboom writes: > > > >> > >> > >> Working with the documentation this past week has me a little > >> frustrated with the state of it. Enough to write a MEP. > > https://github.com/matpl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP10: Modernizing the documentation

2012-08-26 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 08/26/2012 05:33 AM, Anton Akhmerov wrote: > Michael Droettboom writes: > >> >> >> Working with the documentation this past week has me a little >> frustrated with the state of it. Enough to write a MEP. > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10 >> In particula

Re: [matplotlib-devel] MEP10: Modernizing the documentation

2012-08-26 Thread Anton Akhmerov
Michael Droettboom writes: > > > > Working with the documentation this past week has me a little > frustrated with the state of it.  Enough to write a MEP.  https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/wiki/Mep10 > In particular, it would be nice to compile a list of concerns abou