Benjamin Root ben.root@... writes:
snip
Essentially, you make a Path object using the vertices, and then use its
contains_point() method.
Ben Root
OK, but given that contains_point works with a *single* point at a time, I have
to call it for all my points which is a bit more cumbersome,
+ one on this issue. One of the big advantages of the nxutils points in poly is
that you could pass it a large numpy array of points and get back a mask. We
found this to be significantly faster than using looping through the single
point in poly algorithms from packages like shapely. Echoing
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
+1 as well. I just took another look at the Path object and I see no such
function. The lack of this function is a problem for me as well in my
existing apps. In order to deprecate nxutils, this functionality needs to
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer option 2 because this is fairly easy and avoids code redundancy.
It would take just a few lines of extra code to do this with the python
sequence protocol as inputs and python lists as return values. It would
take
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
+1 as well. I just took another look at the Path object and I see no
such function. The lack of this function is a problem for me as well in my
_path.cpp already has a number of methods that use Numpy arrays (John
is mistaken that it doesn't depend on Numpy), so adding another is no
problem.
It was my understanding that nxutils was an internal usage module and
not part of the public API, and therefore could be removed as long as
On 03/08/2012 07:16 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com
mailto:jdh2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu
mailto:ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
+1 as well. I just took another look
On 03/08/2012 12:35 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
It shouldn't be a problem to build a compatibility shim -- I'd much
rather do that than have multiple functions
Oops -- hit send too soon. I meant to say I'd much rather do that than
have multiple functions that do virtually the same thing
There is a proposed solution to all of this here:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/746
Please test -- I don't have any nxutils-using code myself, and
matplotlib itself has none. We should probably convert some of the
nxutils code in the wild into some unit tests.
Mike
On
Hi,
I've had an import error with some of my code, specifically with nxutils (I need
it for using points_inside_poly).
In [1]: import matplotlib.nxutils as nx
---
ImportError Traceback (most
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jorge Scandaliaris
jorgesmbox...@yahoo.eswrote:
Hi,
I've had an import error with some of my code, specifically with nxutils
(I need
it for using points_inside_poly).
In [1]: import matplotlib.nxutils as nx
On 03/07/2012 11:59 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Jorge Scandaliaris
jorgesmbox...@yahoo.es mailto:jorgesmbox...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hi,
I've had an import error with some of my code, specifically with
nxutils (I need
it for using points_inside_poly).
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
I agree that the deprecation process should have been followed better.
However, I'm not sure what you mean by them being faster than their Pyhton
counterparts. Both functions in nxutils are replaced by functions in
On 03/07/2012 01:39 PM, John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu
mailto:md...@stsci.edu wrote:
I agree that the deprecation process should have been followed
better. However, I'm not sure what you mean by them being faster
than
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
On 03/07/2012 01:39 PM, John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.eduwrote:
I agree that the deprecation process should have been followed better.
However, I'm not sure
15 matches
Mail list logo
