Dear all,
By using Matpower for OPF solution with several
solvers I recognize that the solution has a bit difference, maybe you tell me
that this difference is not important for OPF, but I found it crucial if I used
the obtained point as initial point in my research, bellow you find an exampl
The point of my previous post was that the power flow was doing what you told
it to (assuming I was correct about you specifying it as a PV bus). If you want
the power flow to solve for the voltage at the bus, given a specified reactive
power injection (which is what you seem to be expecting), t
All of the AC OPF solvers are numerical solvers with termination tolerances. If
you want more precise solutions, you have to make these tolerances smaller.
Since they solve for local optima, it is always possible that different
algorithms will find different local optima, but in your case I thin
Thanks
From: r...@cornell.edu
Subject: Re: MIPs and FMINCON solvers
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:39:04 -0500
To: matpowe...@list.cornell.edu
All of the AC OPF solvers are numerical solvers with termination tolerances. If
you want more precise solutions, you have to make these tolerances smaller
