riginal Message-
> From: Gerald de Jong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mav-user] global views
>
> On Thursday 14 February 2002 22:21, Gerald de Jong wrote:
> > would you call it sloppy if we c
On Thursday 14 February 2002 22:21, Gerald de Jong wrote:
> would you call it sloppy if we changed the word "cascading" into
> "inheritance"? virtually the same thing happens in your java code, so why
> not in the maverick.xml command hierarchy?
btw, another way to represent an inheritance hie
e much
> more clear where the definition for each view comes from and what is
> available to the controller for any given command.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gerald de
> Jong
> Sent: Thu
PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald de Jong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mav-user] global views
>
> when i first understood the "global view" concept (no name for it at
I think the param in the config file may be too black and white. I kind of
like the direction Gerald is thinking.
You could have something like:
Group global could be a standard group--anything in there gets automa
i just noticed i forgot to close the view tags in the commands. should be:
- Original Message -
From: "jim moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] global views
en command.
Thoughts?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gerald de
Jong
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mav-user] global views
when i first understood the "global view" concept (no name f
when i first understood the "global view" concept (no name for it at the
time) i assumed it was a hierarchical thing. i figured you could corral a
bunch of commands together and give them a few views to fall back on. turns
out they were truly global. i was thinking "cascade".
what say we ta
Before I go into a discussion of the why... Let me ask this:
Should there be an option to have global views work they used to? (I was
thinking along the lines of a param for the config file to switch modes)
-
Jeff and I spent a good amount of time discussing this since the 1.0
r
