On 9/21/16, chris glur wrote:
>> you should tick the "All charsets" and "Case sensitive"
>> checkboxes first.
>
> Previously I never succeeded.
> With those 2 'ticks', it finds the first matching byte on the display only.
>
> Once the endianism is determined you can use:
> ->
On 9/26/16, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
> I am using thousands separator with ls, and it hugely increases
> readability:
>
> BLOCK_SIZE="'1" ls -lAF
>
You'll have this feature when ticket #3666 advances.[1]
>
> is there a simple way how I could modify the code, so that file
On 9/20/16, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-19 05:11, Mooffie wrote:
>> That expression (6 * 30 * 24 * 60 * 60) equals 0x00ed4e00. Use MC's
>> viewer to edit /usr/bin/mc: press for hex view. Search for "00 4e
>> ed 00" (assuming little endian).
>
> I did not manage to
Hello,
is there a simple way how I could modify the code, so that file size
displayed in mc has thousands separator?
I am using thousands separator with ls, and it hugely increases readability:
BLOCK_SIZE="'1" ls -lAF
i.e. it takes couple of seconds to see the magnitude of a number like
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
I think that must have the same underlying reason as this ticket:
http://www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/3406
... do you have the same issue with 4.8.17, i.e. is this a regression,
or an old bug? In any case, I've just tried it, and for me it
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
"Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thank you for testing!
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
>
> > Have found "SFTP Protocol error (-31)" when entering directory with
> > cyrillic names in it. But after error
Hi Andrey,
Thank you for testing!
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
Have found "SFTP Protocol error (-31)" when entering directory with
cyrillic names in it. But after error MC show correct directory listing.
I think that must have the same underlying reason as this ticket:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 20:43:46 +0200
"Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote:
> TLDR; we would appreciate if you could test the following tarball on
> your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to 4.8.17:
>
>