Re: Later version's facilities ?

2008-01-03 Thread chris glur
I did not claim that mc was getting much slower. It has to depend on a slowing OS. Nor do I need to waste resources continually up-dating mc, since I'm confident that it's mature and quite stable. BTW this gmailer is crap, except for reducing spam. == Chris Glur. On 1/2/08, Pavel Roskin [EMAIL

Re: Later version's facilities ?

2008-01-02 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 14:49 +0300, chris glur wrote: Because 'the software gets slower, faster than the hardware gets faster', I've gone 'back' to an older linux installation which uses mc ver. 4.5.55. I was the maintainer between versions 4.5.55 and 4.6.0, and there was very little new code

Re: Later version's facilities ?

2007-12-31 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:49:38PM +0300, chris glur wrote: Because 'the software gets slower, faster than the hardware gets faster', I've gone 'back' to an older linux installation which uses mc ver. 4.5.55. The newer/slower linux has ver. 4.6.0, which has the nice facility of 'copying the

Later version's facilities ?

2007-12-30 Thread chris glur
Because 'the software gets slower, faster than the hardware gets faster', I've gone 'back' to an older linux installation which uses mc ver. 4.5.55. The newer/slower linux has ver. 4.6.0, which has the nice facility of 'copying the selected fileID to the command line, by Ctrl-enter'. I now see