Re: quick-view line-wrap bug.

2010-01-06 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:02:34 +0100 Janek Kozicki wrote: > In new version, when line-wrapping is enabled, there is an empty line > between two line-wrapped lines. [skip] > Frankly - I don't like this :) Me too. :) Thanks for the bugreport. I've created a ticket: http://www.midnight-commander.org/

quick-view line-wrap bug.

2010-01-06 Thread Janek Kozicki
Hi, In new version, when line-wrapping is enabled, there is an empty line between two line-wrapped lines. Just see it yourself: Left File Command Options Right +---++<- ...5x5-stochastyka -.[^]>+ |File: GEN-2mm_~-01.xml 5%||'n Name |Size |Modify tim

Re: New "layout" question.

2010-01-06 Thread MP
> sorting by columns, just by clicking on the column is faster than > going to menu and selecting the sort method. It's a one click > vs. 5 or 6 keystrokes. Same about sorting direction. It's one click vs. one keyboard shortcut (2 keystrokes). You can define shortcuts in ~/.mc/mc.keymap - for ex

Re: New "layout" question.

2010-01-06 Thread MP
> Maybe a better way to indicate the sorting method, would be to take > that column heading into brackets, or print it in different color? This won't be universally usable, as you can sort by fields that are not visible in your view mode (like mtime if you have mode that shows only name, size and

Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

2010-01-06 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 06.01.2010 23:33, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Even if I repeat myself now: my plan is to replace mc-internal > vfs my mvfs in the long run. Of course, there's still a lot to do, > mainly port existing vfs'es to mvfs. As smb is planned to be > reimplemen

Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

2010-01-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev schrieb: > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:33 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > libmvfs is actively maintained by me (and I dont see any reason for > > abandoning it ever). As it's vital to several of my customer projects, > > I'll always maintain it. > > If you want it to be an open

Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

2010-01-06 Thread Janek Kozicki
Yury V. Zaytsev said: (by the date of Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:31:14 +0100) > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:33 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > libmvfs is actively maintained by me (and I dont see any reason for > > abandoning it ever). As it's vital to several of my customer projects, > > I'll alway

Re: New "layout" question.

2010-01-06 Thread Janek Kozicki
Andrew Borodin said: (by the date of Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:06:38 +0300) > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:29:04 +0100 Janek Kozicki wrote: > > +<- ~ .[^]>++<- ~ > > .[^]>+ > > |'n Name | Size |Modify time ||'n Name | Size |Modify

Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

2010-01-06 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:33 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > libmvfs is actively maintained by me (and I dont see any reason for > abandoning it ever). As it's vital to several of my customer projects, > I'll always maintain it. If you want it to be an open project, why wouldn't you for starters cr

Re: New "layout" question.

2010-01-06 Thread SZABĂ“ Gergely
Janek Kozicki wrote: Oswald Buddenhagen said: (by the date of Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:47:15 +0100) - assuming mouse interaction is removed, just displaying the current state is relatively useless as well, as one can easily see the effects in the first place. sorting by columns, jus

Re: Regular jabber meetings

2010-01-06 Thread Andrew Borodin
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:17:08 +0100 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > quickly discuss the project progress (what had been done, what's not > done yet) and what the next steps should be ? Just look at the open tickets and ticket statictics in the current milestone. -- Andrew _

Re: Mc-devel Digest, Vol 66, Issue 5

2010-01-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev schrieb: Hi, > My personal issue with mvfs is that it's basically an unsupported > project. libmvfs is actively maintained by me (and I dont see any reason for abandoning it ever). As it's vital to several of my customer projects, I'll always maintain it. > Your signature is

Regular jabber meetings

2010-01-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, what do you think about regular jabber meetings in a fixed timeframe (eg. 30mins, once or twice per week) where quickly discuss the project progress (what had been done, what's not done yet) and what the next steps should be ? cu -- -

Re: New "layout" question.

2010-01-06 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:14:25AM +0100, Janek Kozicki wrote: > Oswald Buddenhagen said: (by the date of Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:47:15 +0100) > > - assuming mouse interaction is removed, just displaying the current > > state is relatively useless as well, as one can easily see the effects > > i