On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:09:08 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
there seem to be some old leftover branches:
1823_prev_line_def
Ticket is not closed yet.
1897_libc_return_values
Removed.
should they get removed ?
And now my questions to you:
1775_mvfs_9P
1775_mvfs_9P_2
1775_mvfs_9P_3
* Andrew Borodin aboro...@vmail.ru schrieb:
And now my questions to you:
1775_mvfs_9P
1775_mvfs_9P_2
1775_mvfs_9P_3
DEV_mvfs_fish
DEV_mvfs_local
METUX.mvfs
Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
test cycles.
WTF? Why you created a lot of branches about your
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:47:30 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
1775_mvfs_9P
1775_mvfs_9P_2
1775_mvfs_9P_3
DEV_mvfs_fish
DEV_mvfs_local
METUX.mvfs
Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
test cycles.
Do you really need these tons of branches for one task?
MC
Hi Guys,
First of all I want to congratulate you for the excellent piece of software
you develop. I use it all the time.
I'm in the process of creating a custom extfs for a special file type, and I
was researching in the existing scripts to get some examples. I was able to
start doing some
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:06 -0300, Gastón Tonietti wrote:
So I was wandering if it is possible for mc to fetch content from
extfs script in a lazy way. The first time I return the list at the
root level, then when mc wants to enter in some of the entries it hits
the script again with
Nice. It should be very useful to handle it this way. Is there any issue for
tracking this improvement or we should open a new one?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Gastón Tonietti gaston.tonie...@gmail.com schrieb:
I'm in the process of creating a
