> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, GoTaR wrote:
>
> > There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
> > bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
> > Here comes fix.
>
> Does the next line work for you? I mean this:
>
> if (( $A < 10 )); then A="0$A"; f
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
> I think patch below make audio.in much more portable.
Applied.
> BTW, I don't see reason to substitute audio from audio.in.
There is @AWK@ in audiofs_copyout(), but it's hard to notice :-)
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
___
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, GoTaR wrote:
> There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
> bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
> Here comes fix.
Does the next line work for you? I mean this:
if (( $A < 10 )); then A="0$A"; fi
I think it's a
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:45:11 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
> > bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
> > Here comes fix.
>
> Does the next line work for you? I mean this:
>
> if (( $A <
Hi!
There's no thing like $[..] to evaluate expressions in POSIX sh, it's
bash feature. sh uses $((..)) instead (and bash understands it too).
Here comes fix.
--
Tom Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -urN mc/vfs/extfs/audio.in mc.new/vfs/extfs/audio.in
--- mc/vfs/extfs/audio.in 2002-12-13 05:4
