On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:34:30 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Andrew Borodin schrieb:
>
> > > Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
> > > test cycles.
> >
> > Do you really need these tons of branches for one task?
>
> They'll get removed once last cleanups are done.
>
* Andrew Borodin schrieb:
> > Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
> > test cycles.
>
> Do you really need these tons of branches for one task?
They'll get removed once last cleanups are done.
How do a few temporary branches hurt you exactly ?
Or is it just that yo
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:47:30 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > 1775_mvfs_9P
> > 1775_mvfs_9P_2
> > 1775_mvfs_9P_3
> > DEV_mvfs_fish
> > DEV_mvfs_local
> > METUX.mvfs
>
> Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
> test cycles.
Do you really need these tons of branches for on
* Andrew Borodin schrieb:
> And now my questions to you:
>
> 1775_mvfs_9P
> 1775_mvfs_9P_2
> 1775_mvfs_9P_3
> DEV_mvfs_fish
> DEV_mvfs_local
> METUX.mvfs
Work in progress. I'll assign it to proper ticket when it passed
test cycles.
> WTF? Why you created a lot of branches about your mvfs stuf
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:09:08 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> there seem to be some old leftover branches:
>
> 1823_prev_line_def
Ticket is not closed yet.
> 1897_libc_return_values
Removed.
> should they get removed ?
And now my questions to you:
1775_mvfs_9P
1775_mvfs_9P_2
1775_mvfs_9P_
