Hi František,
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote:
> -const char * const b = "{}{[][()(<><", *p;
> +const char * const b = "{}{[][()(", *p;
> -if (strchr ("{[(<", c))
> +if (strchr ("{[(", c))
If you'd like the extra match please implement this so the stri
František Řezníček wrote:
You're right that nowadays C code doesn't require that, but are we
sure that for instance function templates feature aren't going to be
available in C?
We can be. From [1]: "The Committee is content to let C++ be the big and
ambitious language. While some features of
we sure that
for instance function templates feature aren't going to be available in C ?
We may think about conditioning this feature, but it requires bigger changes to
CoolEdit used in MC.
Kind Regards,
Frantisek
> Puvodni zprava
> Od: Jindrich Novy <[
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 03:27:45PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> So I don't see why we couldn't extend the current functionality (until
> you've finished the syntax highlighting rewrite ;)).
>
:-P
> > the highlighting hurts - not much, but it is still annoying.
>
> It's already there fo
Hi Oswald,
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:27, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:01, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > wow, _that_ was new to me ... haha.
>
> ? Not sure what to make of this (cynicism or a genuine remark). I ment
> they use different code paths (afaict).
Never mind t
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:01, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:03:25PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > > i think it should be part of the syntax definition, which would be
> > > extended from highlighting only.
> >
> > This is not about highlighting, the highlighting
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:03:25PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > i think it should be part of the syntax definition, which would be
> > extended from highlighting only.
>
> This is not about highlighting, the highlighting is a side effect of
> the "jump to matching bracket" option.
>
>
Hi Oswald,
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 12:14, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > An editor_match_bracket_open_str and editor_match_bracket_close_str
> > option in ini.
> >
> i think it should be part of the syntax definition, which wou
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:08:48PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 15:25, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > I can imagine the enhancement can be useful for XML/HTML/PHP, etc. but
> > maybe it could be a configurable feature if considered to be committed
> > at all.
>
> I like t
Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 15:25, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> I can imagine the enhancement can be useful for XML/HTML/PHP, etc. but
> maybe it could be a configurable feature if considered to be committed
> at all.
I like that idea. An editor_match_bracket_open_str and
editor_match_bracket_cl
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:31 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Jindrich,
>
> On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> > cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> > editing
Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> editing C source files for instance.
I figured this patch is about the "Go to matchi
Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> cases.
Highlighting where? Is this in any way related to the syntax
highlighting?
> Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> editin
Hello Frantisek,
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote:
> here are the changes (just unified diff) :
Please send the patch as an attachment for the next time, it makes
extraction of it less painful.
> # Should I use the latest nighbuild and incorporate the changes there or y
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 15:45, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> The description of the patch can be found at the end of the email i.e.
> after the patch :)
What exactly is edit_get_bracket used for? Doesn't seem to have anything
to do with syntax highlighting. So my question is what this bracket
ma
Hello,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi František,
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07, František Řezníček wrote:
> > 4 files changed edit/edit.c, edit/editdraw.c, src/color.c, src/color.h.
> > Changes were done on night build mc-2004-12-01-22.tar.gz.
> > If you request to be r
Hi František,
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07, František Řezníček wrote:
> 4 files changed edit/edit.c, edit/editdraw.c, src/color.c, src/color.h.
> Changes were done on night build mc-2004-12-01-22.tar.gz.
> If you request to be redone on the last code, let me know.
Could you please briefly explain
Hello all,
4 files changed edit/edit.c, edit/editdraw.c, src/color.c, src/color.h.
Changes were done on night build mc-2004-12-01-22.tar.gz.
If you request to be redone on the last code, let me know.
here are the changes (just unified diff) :
xx008:reznicek> diff -u edit/edit.c edit/edit.c.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
