On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
[...] I told you many times - you are too fast, too eager.
This is not the right tone for feedback. Leonard hasn't yet committed
his change. If he had, this tone would be appropriate. Please choose
your words to sound a little
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:10:49 +0300
Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
[...] I told you many times - you are too fast, too eager.
This is not the right tone for feedback. Leonard hasn't yet
committed his change. If he
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Marcel Pol wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:10:49 +0300
Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
[...] I told you many times - you are too fast, too eager.
This is not the right tone for feedback.
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Suddenly everyone on this list is only interested in sporting the right
tone. Whatever the tone it cannot hide the fact that decisions are made
from people that hardly have the skills to do so.
Just to remind you: Leonard hasn't made a decision, but only a
suggestion.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Suddenly everyone on this list is only interested in sporting the right
tone. Whatever the tone it cannot hide the fact that decisions are made
from people that hardly have the skills to do so.
Just to remind you: Leonard
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 12:30 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Suddenly everyone on this list is only interested in sporting the right
tone.
Friendly or at least polite communication motivates people to help out
with the project. Even criticism can very be helpful but it should be
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 13:00 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
He was insisting that everything is fine .
I wasn't. I just wanted people to have the actual patch I used so they
at least have something that applies. The original patch wasn't very
useful in that sense unless you'd figured you'd
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
[...]
Whatever the tone it cannot hide the fact that decisions are made
from people that hardly have the skills to do so.
I think you are a.o. things referring to my lack of knowledge on
configure magic. Firstly I am not making decisions,
Hi Pavel,
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 15:12 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
How convenient - loose other peoples time instead of your own.
I think I've invested enough time in mc in the last year that I can
expect somebody to help me out with a subject I'm not that familiar
without having to feel ashamed.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
I think I've invested enough time in mc in the last year that I can
expect somebody to help me out with a subject I'm not that familiar
without having to feel ashamed. Reading the autoconf manual and
understanding all the macros will cost me
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
All the discussion about slang2 and the utf-8 patch has inspired me to
create an internal version of slang-2.0.4 to mc. This patch might still
be somewhat rough around the edges, but it builds after a configure
--with-screen=mcslang2. Please
This is plain wrong:
diff -pruN mc/acinclude.m4 mc.slang2/acinclude.m4
--- mc/acinclude.m4 2005-07-20 14:45:13.0 +0200
+++ mc.slang2/acinclude.m4 2005-09-26 22:31:34.0 +0200
@@ -674,7 +674,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([MC_SLANG_PRIVATE], [
AC_CACHE_CHECK([if S-Lang exports private
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 15:13 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
This is plain wrong:
diff -pruN mc/acinclude.m4 mc.slang2/acinclude.m4
+ #if SLANG_VERSION 2
You are not writing C code here - this is shell scripting.
A similar construct is used on line 684 in the original
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 15:13 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
This is plain wrong:
diff -pruN mc/acinclude.m4 mc.slang2/acinclude.m4
+ #if SLANG_VERSION 2
You are not writing C code here - this is shell scripting.
A similar construct is used on line 684 in the original file.
feedback to
improve it. Sorry for not posting the correct patch immediately.
configure, make distcheck and a consequent build after configure
--with-screen=mcslang2 is fine (assuming the correct patch is applied,
which still awaits moderator approval, but you got it already).
Please explain to me why
was perfect yet. Looking for some feedback to
improve it. Sorry for not posting the correct patch immediately.
configure, make distcheck and a consequent build after configure
--with-screen=mcslang2 is fine (assuming the correct patch is applied,
which still awaits moderator approval, but you got
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 20:39 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Bootstrap the code and see the generated configure file. Similiar
construct
is used but in different context. I told you many times - you are too
fast,
too eager.
I didn't say this patch was perfect yet. Looking for some feedback
Hi Roland,
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:12 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
As Pavel already said, you are writing shell programs here. So the #if,
#else and #endif are actually comments. Your linker will most likely
have -lslang -lslang2 somewhere in its command line.
I now see the private refers to
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:47 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
It is obvious that you are missing basic knowledge on configure magic.
Right :-) . Thank you for helping me out there.
You did some copy/paste and you expect that it will just work ?
Well, when building --with-screen=mcslang2
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 21:56 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
I now see the private refers to the private slang functions in the
*system* slang,
Hm. I guess the above is not correct. It refers to the private functions
in any version.
Do we need -lslang2 when linking against slang2? Or
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
All the discussion about slang2 and the utf-8 patch has inspired me to
create an internal version of slang-2.0.4 to mc. This patch might still
be somewhat rough around the edges, but it builds after a configure
--with-screen=mcslang2. Please
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
[...] I told you many times - you are too fast, too eager.
This is not the right tone for feedback. Leonard hasn't yet committed
his change. If he had, this tone would be appropriate. Please choose
your words to sound a little more polite.
Roland
with mcslang2.
Not sure if this is caused by the usage of slang2 or the fact that I ran
mc from the build directory.)
And, no, -lslang2 doesn't make sense. It's just -lslang for both slang1
and slang2.
Right. Thanks :-) . That solves the discussed issue. The discussed hunks
can thus be dropped
Hi,
All the discussion about slang2 and the utf-8 patch has inspired me to
create an internal version of slang-2.0.4 to mc. This patch might still
be somewhat rough around the edges, but it builds after a configure
--with-screen=mcslang2. Please review.
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna
24 matches
Mail list logo
