Last summer, AAMD began recommending that museums can share thumbnail-sized
(max 250x300 px in their definition) images of works with problematic copyright
under Fair Use.
This announcement came before the Met's recent website relaunch, but /after/ we
had already committed to displaying thumbna
Matt,
Chris Sundt posted a related question about who is following AAMD
thumbnail guidelines on the VRA list a short while ago. You might want
to check the archives of that list to see what responses she received (
http://listserv.uark.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=VRA-L)
Diane
On 6/12/12 10:12 AM, Mo
FW:
From: ImageMuse at yahoogroups.com [mailto:ImageMuse at yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Amalyah Keshet [akes...@imj.org.il]
Sent: 07 August, 2011 11:36 AM
To: 'ImageMuse at yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [ImageMuse] AAMD Guidelines on Fair Use
Our collections database went online in 2006 with
, June 13, 2012 2:11 AM
To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
Subject: Re: [MCN-L] AAMD thumbnail image size guidelines
FW:
From: ImageMuse at yahoogroups.com [mailto:ImageMuse at yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Amalyah Keshet [akes...@imj.org.il]
Sent: 07 August, 2011 11:36 AM
To: 'ImageMu
rgan,
Matt [matt.mor...@metmuseum.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 16:55
To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
Subject: Re: [MCN-L] AAMD thumbnail image size guidelines
Thanks to Amalyah and Diane for the helpful replies!
Amalyah, I love how you get 250x300 = 300x300. Turning vagueness to