Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-03 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Ralph Smeets wrote: > > > At the least, its a fair competitor to MD, *sort of* making up for sound > > > quality and limited storage space. Size-wise, its pretty crap, its the size > > > of a mini laptop.. > > > > 9.9lbs What's that in kg? 4.5

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-03 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * " nick " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 04 Nov 1999 | At the least, its a fair competitor to MD, *sort of* making up for sound | quality and limited storage space. Size-wise, its pretty crap, its the size | of a mini laptop.. One of which I own (V

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-03 Thread Simon Gardner
> 9.9lbs What's that in kg? 4.5kg? That's not very portable > > > At worst, this could partly kill a developing MD market, if publicity goes > > the wrong way.. > > > > At $810 and at 4.4 kg? No way. It might appeal for those that want something to put in their car - but then the empeg i

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie (more information)

1999-01-03 Thread Ryan Shoemaker
(I apologize if this is a duplicate post - I thought I hit the send button the first time, but since I never received my own message, I'm sending it again.) For more product information: http://www.pjbox.com/intro/main.htm And for technical specs: http://www.pjbox.com/intro/spec.htm

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread Magic
From: nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 1999 10:05 AM Subject: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie > At the least, its a fair competitor to MD, *sort of* making up for sound > quality and limited storage space. Size-wise, its pretty

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread Jason K. Fritcher
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Ralph Smeets wrote: > > At the least, its a fair competitor to MD, *sort of* making up for sound > > quality and limited storage space. Size-wise, its pretty crap, its the size > > of a mini laptop.. > > 9.9lbs What's that in kg? 4.5kg? That's not very portable Take

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread Rodney Peterson
A unit this big playing only MP3 really makes very little sense, unlike a portable DVD player. Yet as nice as portable DVD players are, a really nice laptop makes much, much more sense. You can plug all the following now or soon into one of these cool workhorses: DVD-ROM or DVD-RAM/RW Wireless I

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread J. Coon
nick wrote: > > G'day > Some jokers have finally come up with a decent mp3 player, if you could call > mp3 decent.. it holds 4.86gigs - 81 hours of music <-snip> > > At worst, this could partly kill a developing MD market, if publicity goes > the wrong way.. > > ...if it

MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread nick
G'day Some jokers have finally come up with a decent mp3 player, if you could call mp3 decent.. it holds 4.86gigs - 81 hours of music - This not-so-little beauty looks like its going to have a big impact on the mp3 scene, which may ripple over into the MD market, and spark another round of fat

Re: MD: 4.86 gig - 81 hour MP3 portie

1999-01-02 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > G'day > Some jokers have finally come up with a decent mp3 player, if you could call > mp3 decent.. it holds 4.86gigs - 81 hours of music - This not-so-little > beauty looks like its going to have a big impact on the mp3 scene, which may > ripple over into the MD mar